Form 10-K

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 26, 2010 was $3.2 billion. This calculation excludes the shares of Class A and Class B common stock held by executive officers, directors and stockholders whose ownership exceeds 5% of the combined shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding at March 26, 2010. This calculation does not reflect a determination that such persons are affiliates for any other purposes.

On November 4, 2010 the registrant had 52,652,649 shares of Class A common stock and 59,208,929 shares of Class B common stock outstanding.

Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the registrant’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed subsequent to the date hereof, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report. Such Definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the conclusion of the registrant’s fiscal year ended September 24, 2010. Except with respect to information specifically incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, the Definitive Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as part of this Form 10-K.

Dolby Laboratories develops and delivers innovative products and technologies that are used throughout the entertainment industry to produce immersive and enjoyable experiences. Over the years, Dolby has introduced innovations that have significantly improved audio entertainment, such as noise reduction for the recording and cinema industries and surround sound for cinema and home entertainment. As a result of these innovations, we believe the Dolby brand has come to symbolize a superior entertainment experience.

Our audio technologies are used throughout the global entertainment industry to deliver a premium audio experience to consumers. Use of our technologies in each step of the entertainment creation, distribution and playback process enables the creator, the producer, and the distributor to develop and present their content to consumers in the manner they intended.

There are a number of current industry trends that provide us with opportunities for future growth, such as the transition to digital television from analog television, and the delivery of media content online and via mobile devices. These trends present us with an opportunity to extend the adoption of our technologies to new devices, as the methods by which content can be delivered and the number of devices capable of playing back the content increase.

We are developing and marketing video technologies that we believe can improve the quality of video presentation. Our offerings include video products aimed at the cinema market, such as our digital cinema server, our Dolby 3D Digital Cinema products, and our Dolby PRM-4200 Professional Reference Monitor, which we market to video professionals. In addition, we are developing and marketing voice technologies that improve voice clarity for use in online gaming and other markets.

We view the video and voice markets as early-stage opportunities for us. We believe that our well-recognized brand, our existing customer relationships, and our history of introducing successful, innovative technologies are important strengths that will help us pursue these opportunities.

Dolby Laboratories is a global organization that generates revenue by licensing technologies to manufacturers of consumer electronics (CE) products and to software vendors and by selling products and related services to entertainment content creators and to distributors. We work with the global entertainment industry in three principal ways:

We currently sell our products and provide services in over 85 countries. In addition we have licensed our technologies to CE manufacturers and to software vendors in 40 countries, which in turn distribute their products incorporating our technologies throughout the world. In fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, revenue from outside of the United States was 66%, 65%, and 66% of our total revenue, respectively. Our licensing business is our most significant revenue stream, representing 84%, 83%, and 77% of our total revenue, in fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010,

respectively. In fiscal 2010, the decrease in our licensing revenue as a percentage of total revenue was due to a greater increase in the growth of our products revenue relative to the growth of our licensing revenue.

Essential Technologies for the Entertainment Creation, Distribution and Playback Process

Our long-term involvement in the entertainment industry has given us an opportunity to provide high-quality services and products at every step of the entertainment creation, distribution and playback process.

Our products and services help artists and content producers create an enhanced entertainment experience by incorporating our technologies into their content to produce immersive entertainment experiences in the manner the artist or producer intend. Our encoding technologies also help maintain the quality of the sound while enabling content to fit within the storage capacity and/or bandwidth limitations of a particular content delivery platform.

Music studios and video game designers produce content encoded with Dolby technologies, which enable digital multichannel sound. Consumers also are able to encode multichannel sound by recording home movies in Dolby Digital using high-definition (HD) camcorders. As a result of these available means of content creation, the library of content encoded with Dolby technologies is growing.

After professional content creators produce their content using our technologies, distributors use our professional equipment to support the delivery of that content. For example, broadcasters purchase and use our products to encode programming content for terrestrial, cable, and satellite transmissions to provide high-quality surround sound to their audiences. Our broadcast products also facilitate the editing and routing of surround sound in transmission facilities originally designed for stereo audio. Our decoding and monitoring products help content creators accurately evaluate how their soundtracks will be reproduced in broadcast transmissions, while our sound engineers supplement all of these efforts by providing training, system design expertise, and on-site technical assistance to broadcasters throughout the world.

DVD and Blu-ray Disc producers also use our professional equipment to encode their audio in Dolby Digital and Dolby Digital Plus so that the soundtrack can be replayed as originally recorded on the master copy.

Entertainment content is increasingly available through online services. Providers of online content work closely with our services team to format their content using our technologies, ensuring that they are able to offer a premium audio experience. In doing so, online content providers are able to match the experience that consumers would otherwise receive from other distribution platforms, such as television broadcasts or DVDs. Today, a growing number of online service providers, including Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Omnifone, Rhapsody, Sonic, and Vudu, use our technologies.

Our Dolby Pulse and Dolby Digital Plus technologies provide efficient multichannel solutions which help mitigate bandwidth constraints in broadcasting or the limited storage capacity of DVD and Blu-ray Disc. Dolby Media Generator, a suite of encoding tools for Dolby Pulse and Dolby Digital Plus, allows mobile content distributors to produce a file compatible with many mobile devices while lowering storage requirements, reducing download times, and boosting playback quality.

As the means of distribution mature, our technologies have the potential to become the standard or recommended solution in the distribution process. For example, as global broadcast standards for digital television and HD television have developed, a number of countries have adopted Dolby audio technologies as their standards. In North America, Dolby Digital is the standard audio technology for digital terrestrial and cable television. In Europe, Dolby Digital Plus is the European Broadcast Union’s recommended audio technology for HD broadcast. A number of European countries, including France, Italy, and the UK, have adopted Dolby Digital Plus as well as high-efficiency advanced audio coding (HE AAC) in their HD terrestrial broadcast standards.

Other countries, such as Brazil, have adopted HE AAC in their standards. Additionally, Dolby Digital Plus is now offered as part of the HD services provided by commercial satellite providers throughout Europe. Lastly, in the Asia Pacific region, South Korea has adopted the ATSC standard for digital television, which includes Dolby Digital, while Japan has adopted AAC as its audio technology standard for digital television. We are one of the original four developers of AAC and receive a portion of AAC licensing revenue through a joint patent licensing program, both as a patent holder and an administrator of the patent licensing program, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Via Licensing.

Each of these products, services, and technologies used throughout the content creation and distribution process enable the final step in the cycle, the content playback process.

Our playback technologies allow content created and distributed using our technologies to be played back as the creator and distributor intended. Today, virtually all manufacturers of DVD players and Blu-ray Disc players throughout the world license our decoding technologies. The majority of operating system vendors and independent software vendors as well as manufacturers of PCs, digital televisions, video game consoles, home-theaters-in-a-box, and audio/video receivers license our decoding technologies. There is an opportunity for growth in mobile devices, set-top boxes, and camcorders, as currently only some manufacturers of these devices incorporate our technologies.

In some cases our licensees sell products that incorporate our technologies to other manufacturers, which incorporate these products in automobiles, PCs, or other products that are then sold to consumers. Our trademarks are often displayed on content and CE products that incorporate our technologies, so that content providers and manufacturers can indicate to consumers that their products meet our technical and quality standards.

For many types of CE products, our technologies are included in explicit industry standards, as standards-setting bodies have mandated their inclusion in a particular type of product. For example, Dolby Digital is the standard audio technology for digital televisions in North America, while Dolby Digital is mandated in all DVD and Blu-ray Disc players worldwide. Alternatively, Dolby technologies are de facto industry standards in many CE products, meaning that although not specifically mandated by a standards board, these technologies are widely adopted for a particular type of product. For example, in the broadcast market, even prior to the adoption of HD terrestrial broadcast standards mandating Dolby technologies, many European HD broadcasters began broadcasting in Dolby Digital or Dolby Digital Plus, leading CE manufacturers to include these technologies in their televisions and set-top boxes for the European market.

We believe these trends increase the total addressable market for our core audio technologies while creating new opportunities for us to deliver complementary technologies that improve sound and video experiences.

In response to market trends, content creators are focused on delivering content across a multitude of media, including DVD, Blu-ray Disc, broadcast, online, and mobile, each of which has different bandwidth and performance requirements. To address these technical needs, we offer a portfolio of multichannel technologies, including Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby Pulse, and Dolby Mobile, each providing a surround sound experience optimized for various storage and bandwidth requirements.

In our broadcast market, where we derive revenue from licensing our technologies to manufacturers of televisions and set-top boxes, we have the opportunity to increase the adoption of our multichannel technologies as more countries transition from analog to digital broadcast and offer HD content. While we have experienced success in increasing the adoption of our technologies in digital broadcast to date, we believe there are still significant opportunities for growth. The efficiency and quality of our multichannel technologies are well suited to digital broadcast bandwidth requirements and to delivering a premium HD content experience. As a result, our multichannel technologies have been adopted in terrestrial digital television standards throughout the world such that our technologies are now in a large percentage of global digital television shipments.

In the PC market, our technologies, including Dolby Digital Plus, are now included in Microsoft’s newest operating system, Windows 7. This operating system incorporates our technologies in four of the six available editions: Home Premium, Ultimate, Professional, and Enterprise. Prior to the release of Windows 7, our technologies were included in only premium consumer editions of Microsoft operating systems. Almost half of the world’s PC shipments are to the business market. The inclusion of our technologies in the Professional and Enterprise editions of Windows 7, which are typically purchased by the business market, increases the potential for us to receive royalties on a greater percentage of PC shipments.

We believe our technologies are also well suited for the mobile market. For example, HE AAC has been selected as an optional technology for use in third generation (“3G”) mobile devices and, as a result, is incorporated into many of these 3G devices. In addition, Dolby Digital Plus is now included in certain mobile phones, enabling these devices to serve as portable media players allowing them to both playback content in Dolby Digital Plus and to connect to other devices, such as televisions, for playback in multichannel surround sound. Nokia’s recently released mobile phone, the N8, includes this technology.

We are also focused on extending our technologies to online distribution. We have an opportunity for our multichannel technologies to be adopted in next-generation delivery platforms and in new types of entertainment devices. For example, as more content becomes available through online service providers, new devices such as tablets and notebooks may take on a more prevalent role as entertainment playback devices.

We believe our long history of developing innovative audio technologies and the established presence of our multichannel technologies in many of the world’s most popular content playback devices enable us to develop and deliver new innovations, such as Dolby Axon, a voice technology that delivers surround sound and enables online gamers to perceive the spatial location of other players. We believe our expertise in areas such as volume control and noise reduction is transferable to solving challenges inherent in today’s consumer devices. We believe the presence of our technologies in many existing professional and consumer devices along with our recognized brand are key strengths as we strive to bring additional technology innovations to market.

We have also developed post processing technologies that enhance the quality of content not originally encoded using our processes. These technologies include our PC Entertainment Experience (PCEE) in the PC market and Dolby Mobile in the mobile market. PCEE technologies, targeted towards entertainment-oriented

PCs, are now included in over 30% of currently available consumer notebook models. Dolby Mobile, which is optimized and designed to enhance the audio quality of media delivered on mobile devices, is well suited for mobile handsets which are increasingly becoming entertainment playback devices.

We have been successful in developing audio technologies that make the entertainment experience immersive and enjoyable. We have now developed technologies that make the video experience compellingly realistic and engaging. In the cinema market, we offer exhibitors our digital cinema servers and other 3D Digital Cinema products. Our 3D Digital Cinema product delivers a vivid 3D movie experience with sharp images and natural colors. We believe the recent success of certain 3D cinema releases will continue to drive further growth in sales of our 3D and digital cinema products. Further, we are extending our development efforts in 3D video to home television. However, we view 3D video on home televisions as an early-stage opportunity.

We have also developed a professional reference monitor, the Dolby PRM-4200, for video professionals so that they can complete color critical tasks, such as calibrating color accuracy to professional reference standards.

We are building on the strength of the Dolby brand to enhance our reputation as a trusted provider of entertainment technologies for professional and consumer applications. We actively encourage our customers to place our trademarks on their products in conjunction with the inclusion of our technologies. In particular, we provide marketing materials such as posters, trailers, and plaques to cinema operators to help them promote the quality of experience that is associated with our brand.

The inclusion of the Dolby trademark on a product informs audiences and consumers that the product incorporates our technologies and meets our quality standards, and we believe this helps CE manufacturers sell their products. We plan to continue to encourage the use of our trademarks throughout the entertainment industry so that professionals and consumers alike will know that we have helped ensure consistent quality as content moves throughout the entertainment process. We believe that the strength of our brand in the entertainment industry also assists us in bringing new audio and video technologies to market.

We believe that technology innovations for entertainment will continue to be adopted first for professional use as filmmakers, music producers, broadcasters, and video game designers look for ways to excite their audiences. We are collaborating with industry professionals to develop new technologies that facilitate and improve content recording, distribution, and playback. Our professional technology solutions often have applicability to the consumer arena and when they apply, we intend to continue to adapt these technologies for use in consumer applications. Our noise reduction, surround sound, and digital audio technologies were all initially developed for professional use and later adapted for use in CE products. We believe that our success in developing technologies for professional use contributes greatly to the attractiveness of our technologies and brand for consumer use.

As the entertainment industry evolves toward global technical standards for content creation and delivery, we actively seek to have our technologies included in industry standards. We develop, maintain, and strengthen relationships within the broad spectrum of entertainment industry participants, professional organizations, and global standards-setting bodies.

We generate revenue in three primary ways: licensing our technologies to manufacturers of CE products and to software vendors, selling video and audio products for the cinema and broadcast industries, and providing a variety of services to support production activities.

We generate a significant portion of our revenue from outside the United States. Financial information by geographical area is set forth in Note 10 “Geographic Data” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

We license our technologies to software vendors and to CE manufacturers (such as manufacturers of digital televisions, set-top boxes, DVD players and recorders, Blu-ray Disc players, video game consoles, audio/video receivers, mobile devices, in-car entertainment systems, home-theater-in-a-box systems, PCs, camcorders, and portable media devices). Our licensing arrangements typically entitle us to receive a specified royalty for every product shipped by our licensees that incorporates our technologies. We also collect fees for administering joint patent licensing programs (informally known as “patent pools”) on behalf of third parties. In fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, our licensing revenue represented 84%, 83%, and 77% of our total revenue, respectively. In fiscal 2010, the decrease in our licensing revenue as a percentage of total revenue was due to a greater increase in the growth of our products revenue relative to the growth of our licensing revenue. We primarily have three different licensing models: a two-tier model, an integrated licensing model, and a patent pool model.

Two-Tier Licensing Model. Most of our licensing business consists of a two-tier licensing model whereby our decoding technology, embodied in reference software and firmware code, are first provided under license to a semiconductor manufacturer. A manufacturer then incorporates our technologies in integrated circuits (ICs). Our licensed semiconductor manufacturers, which we refer to as “implementation licensees,” then sell their ICs to manufacturers of CE products, which are Dolby “system licensees.” Our system licensees separately obtain licenses from us that allow them to make and sell end-user CE products that incorporate ICs purchased from our implementation licensees.

Our implementation licensees may use our reference software and other licensed know-how directly to build and sell core technologies such as ICs or software library modules. The implementation licensees pay us a one-time, up-front administrative fee per license. In exchange, the licensee receives a licensing package, which includes certain information useful in implementing our technologies into their chipsets. Once the licensee has built its chipset, it sends us a sample for quality control evaluation. If we approve the implementation design, the licensee is permitted to sell the chipset only to our system licensees. We do not receive any royalties from implementation licensees.

Our system licensees pay us an initial fee for the technologies they choose to license from us. We deliver a licensing package to system licensees. This package includes useful information for using our technologies in the licensee’s products. System licensees are required to provide us with prototypes of products that incorporate our technologies for quality control evaluation or, under certain circumstances, self test results for our review. If the design is approved, the licensee is permitted to buy ICs from any Dolby implementation licensee and to sell approved products to retailers, distributors, and consumers. Unlike the sales of ICs by implementation licensees, sales of CE products incorporating our technologies by system licensees are royalty-bearing, generally based upon the number of units shipped by the system licensees that incorporate our technologies. We have active licensing arrangements with approximately 400 electronics product manufacturers and software developer licensees, with corporate headquarters located in 40 countries.

The amount of royalties we collect from a system licensee on a particular product depends on a number of factors such as the number of Dolby technologies used in that product and the total production volume for all products containing our technologies shipped by the system licensee.

Integrated Licensing Model. In addition to licensing under our two-tier licensing model, we also license our technologies, as embodied in reference software code, to operating system vendors and to independent software vendors and to certain other CE manufacturers that act as combined implementation and system licensees. These licensees incorporate our technologies in their software and mobile applications, such as PC software DVD players used in desktop or notebook computers, or in integrated circuits they manufacture themselves and then incorporate into their CE products. In these cases, the “implementation” and the “system” licensee is one and the same. As with the two-tier licensing model, the dual licensee pays us an initial administrative fee. In exchange, the licensee receives a licensing package, which includes information on how to incorporate our technologies into the licensee’s software program or integrated circuits. Once the licensee has built its product, it sends us a sample or, under certain circumstances, self test results for quality control evaluation. If the sample is approved, the licensee is permitted to sell the product to retailers, to distributors, and to consumers, subject to the payment of royalties, generally for each unit shipped.

Licensing of Patent Pools. Through our wholly owned subsidiary, Via Licensing, we administer joint patent licensing programs, or patent pools, on behalf of third party patent owners. Some of the patent pools also include Dolby patents. These patent pools allow product manufacturers streamlined access to certain essential patents to standardized technologies in the fields of audio coding, interactive television, digital radio, and wireless technologies.

We design and manufacture video and audio products for the film production, cinema, and television broadcast industries. Distributed in over 60 countries, these products are used in content creation, distribution, and playback to enhance image and sound quality, provide surround sound, and increase the efficiency of sound storage and distribution. Our product sales are derived from sales of our digital 3D products, which provide 3D capabilities, as well as sales of digital cinema servers that load, store, decrypt, and decode encrypted digital film files for presentation on digital projectors in theaters.

Revenue is also derived from sales of our traditional cinema processors, which movie theaters use to process film soundtracks, and to a lesser extent, sales of broadcast products used to encode and distribute content to viewers. We also offer related digital cinema processors and media adapters to decode digital cinema soundtracks, and digital cinema accessories that allow exhibitors to easily integrate our digital cinema servers with their existing automation systems. Digital cinema is based on open standards, which, unlike our traditional cinema products, do not include our proprietary audio technologies. In fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, our product revenue represented 11%, 13%, and 20% of our total revenue, respectively.

We offer a variety of services to support film production, television broadcast, and music production. Our engineers work alongside filmmakers, television broadcasters, and music producers to help them use our products and technologies to create and reproduce the content they envision. We typically enter into service agreements with motion picture studios or filmmakers to provide them with production services related to the preparation of a Dolby soundtrack, such as equipment calibration, mixing room alignment, and equalization. Under these agreements, we provide our encoders to the studios for use during sound mixing, enabling them to create films with Dolby soundtracks using our proprietary technologies.

Dolby provides other services such as print quality control, professional film mastering services to prepare movies for digital release, and theater system calibration for important screenings, such as premieres, film festivals, and press screenings. Our engineers also provide training, system design consultation and on-site technical expertise to cinema operators throughout the world to help them configure their screening rooms and equipment to ensure that movies are replayed with consistent high quality. In fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, our services revenue represented 5%, 4%, and 3% of our total revenue, respectively.

Our core technologies are signal processing systems that enhance basic sound quality or enable surround sound in movie soundtracks, DVDs, Blu-ray Discs, personal computers, digital televisions, mobile devices, video games, and satellite and cable broadcasts. Many of our technologies are incorporated into professional products that we manufacture, including cinema sound processors and digital audio encoders and decoders. We have also expanded our focus on developing and delivering new audio and video technologies that enhance the entertainment experience, including audio technologies for mobile devices and video technologies for digital 3D, digital cinema, post-production, and LED backlit LCD televisions.

Certain of our technologies have been adopted as the explicit or de facto industry standard. Explicit industry standards are adopted through a formal negotiated standards process, whereby government entities, industry standards-setting bodies, trade associations, and others evaluate and then prescribe or require the use of a technology. We participate in a broad spectrum of organizations and industry standards bodies worldwide that establish explicit industry standards. De facto industry standards are adopted by industry participants when technologies are introduced to the marketplace and become widely used.

We sell and market technologies, products and services throughout the entertainment industry through an internal sales staff and through distributors. We maintain sales offices in the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, China, Taiwan, Germany, the Netherlands, South Korea, Russia and India.

We focus our marketing efforts on consumer electronics, personal computer, broadcast, cinema, production services, gaming, automotive, video, and mobile markets. We reach these markets primarily through industry trade shows, public relations, our website, partner events, and direct marketing.

Historically, we have focused our research and development primarily on audio signal processing technologies. Increasingly, we have expanded our research and development efforts into new audio, voice and video areas. By focusing on creation, proof of feasibility and early stage prototyping of patentable new audio, voice, image, and related technologies, our research groups serve as a source of new technologies for the engineering and technology development teams. The research groups also help identify, investigate, and analyze new long-term opportunities, help develop our technology strategy, and provide support for internally developed and externally acquired technologies.

Engineering and technology development teams take the technologies developed by the research group and further develop such technologies for use in our professional products and by our licensees. In addition, our engineering and technology development teams are involved in the commercialization of technologies created by third parties.

We conduct our research and development activities at a number of locations, including Burbank, San Francisco and Santa Clara, California, Yardley, Pennsylvania, Sydney, Australia, Vancouver, Canada, Stockholm, Sweden, Beijing, China, Nuremberg and Berlin, Germany. Our research and development expenses were $77.5 million, $81.5 million and $105.0 million, in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

Our product quality is ensured through the use of highly automated assembly processes and the rigorous testing of our products compared to all published specifications.

We have a single production facility, and use contract manufacturers to produce some of our higher volume product lines as needed. We purchase components and fabricated parts from multiple suppliers. We rely on sole source suppliers for some of the components that we use to manufacture our products. We source components and fabricated parts locally, but we also buy globally in order to ensure continued supply.

We license our technologies to software vendors, such as operating system vendors and independent software vendors, and to integrated circuit manufacturers. Our licensees also include manufacturers of home audio and video products, set-top boxes, video game consoles, mobile devices, in-car entertainment systems, and PC manufacturers.

We have customers in a wide range of entertainment industries and sell our professional products either directly to the end user customer or, more commonly, through dealers and distributors. Users of our professional products and services include movie studios, cinema operators, film distributors, broadcasters, and video game designers.

Microsoft Corporation, one of our licensees, accounted for approximately 10% of our total revenue in fiscal 2008 and 2009 and for 12% of our total revenue in fiscal 2010.

Some of our current and future competitors may have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and other resources than we do, or may have more experience or advantages in the markets in which they compete. For example, some of our current or potential competitors may have an advantage over us in the market for online technologies because of their greater experience in that market. In addition, some of our current or potential competitors may be able to offer integrated system solutions in certain markets for entertainment technologies, including audio, video, and rights management technologies related to personal computers or the internet, which could make competing technologies that we develop or acquire unnecessary. By offering an integrated system solution, these potential competitors also may be able to offer competing technologies at lower prices than we can, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Several of our competitors have introduced digital cinema products that support the presentation of movies with higher resolution “4K” digital cinema projectors. Certain major U.S. exhibitors have begun installing 4K digital cinema equipment into their theaters. In the future, other exhibitors may feel that they need to outfit some or all of their theaters with 4K digital cinema equipment to compete in the same markets where competitors are promoting 4K products. Dolby currently does not offer a 4K digital cinema product. If we do not offer a product that supports 4K presentation, our future prospects in digital cinema may be limited and our business could be adversely affected.

We also face competitive risks in situations where our customers are also current or potential competitors. For example, Sony and Microsoft are significant licensee customers and Sony is a significant purchaser of our broadcast products and services, but Sony and Microsoft are also competitors with respect to some of our broadcast and consumer technologies.

Many of the CE products that include our audio technologies also include audio technologies developed by our competitors. We believe that the principal competitive factors in each of our markets include some or all of the following:

In general, we are unable to quantify our market share in any particular market in which we operate. Our products and services span the audio portions of several separate and diverse industries, including the cinema, broadcasting, video game, and recording industries. The lack of clear definition of the markets in which our products, services and technologies are sold or licensed, the basic nature of our technologies, which can be used for a variety of purposes, and the diverse nature of and lack of detailed reporting by our competitors makes it impracticable to quantify our position.

We have a substantial base of intellectual property assets, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets such as know-how.

We derive our licensing revenue principally from our Dolby Digital technologies. Patents relating to our Dolby Digital technologies have begun to expire and the remaining patents relating to this technology generally expire between now and 2017, and additional patents relating to our Dolby Digital Plus technologies, an extension of Dolby Digital, expire between 2018 and 2026. In addition, the remaining patents relating to Dolby Digital Live technologies, an extension of Dolby Digital, are scheduled to expire in 2021.

We pursue a general practice of filing patent applications for our technology in the United States and various foreign countries where our customers manufacture, distribute, or sell licensed products. We actively pursue new applications to expand our patent portfolio to address new technology innovations. We have multiple patents covering unique aspects and improvements for many of our technologies.

We have over 990 trademark registrations throughout the world for a variety of word marks, logos and slogans. Our marks cover our various products, technologies, improvements and features, as well as the services

that we provide. Our trademarks are an integral part of our licensing program and licensees typically elect to place our trademarks on their products to inform consumers that their products incorporate our technology and meet our quality specifications. Our trademarks include the following:

We protect our intellectual property rights both domestically and internationally. In the past, however, we have experienced problems with consumer electronics product manufacturers in emerging economies. Manufacturers have failed to report or underreported shipments of their products that incorporate our technologies. We have also had problems with implementation licensees selling ICs with our technologies to third parties that are not system licensees. We expect to experience such problems in the future.

Moreover, we have relatively few or no issued patents in certain countries. For example, in China and Taiwan we have only limited patent protection, especially with respect to our Dolby Digital technologies. Consequently, in the future we may recognize less revenue from Dolby Digital from those regions. In India, we have no issued patents for Dolby Digital technologies. Thus, maintaining or growing our licensing revenue in developing countries such as China, Taiwan, and India will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain patent rights in these counties, which is uncertain. Moreover, because of the limitations of the legal systems in many countries, the effectiveness of patents obtained or that may in the future be obtained, if any, is likewise uncertain.

As of September 24, 2010, we had 1,244 employees worldwide, of which 393 employees were based outside of the United States. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our employee relations are good.

We were founded in London, England in 1965 and incorporated as a New York corporation in 1967. We reincorporated in California in 1976 and reincorporated in Delaware in September 2004. Our principal corporate offices are located at 100 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California 94103, and our telephone number is (415) 558-0200.

Our internet address is www.dolby.com. We make available on our website, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Our SEC reports can be accessed through the Investor Relations section of our internet website. The information found on our internet website is not part of this or any other report we file with or furnish to the SEC.

The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we presently deem less significant may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

We depend on the sale by our licensees of products that incorporate our technologies and a reduction in those sales would adversely affect our licensing revenue.

We derive most of our revenue from the licensing of our technologies to digital entertainment product manufacturers. Licensing revenue represented 84%, 83%, and 77% of our total revenue in fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. We do not manufacture digital entertainment products ourselves and our licensing revenue is dependent on sales by our licensees of products that incorporate our technologies. We cannot control these manufacturers’ product development or commercialization efforts or predict their success. We also face the risk that our licensees have product channel inventory levels in excess of future anticipated sales. If such sales do not occur in the time frame anticipated by our licensee for any reason, these licensees may substantially decrease the amount of products they sell and therefore technologies they license from us in subsequent periods.

In addition, our license agreements, which typically require manufacturers of digital entertainment products and software vendors to pay us a specified royalty for every electronics product shipped that incorporates our technologies, do not require these manufacturers to include our technologies in any specific number or percentage of units, and only a few of these agreements guarantee us a minimum aggregate licensing fee. Accordingly, if our licensees sell fewer products incorporating our technologies, or otherwise face significant economic difficulties, our revenue will decline.

Moreover, we have a widespread presence in markets for electronics products, such as the Consumer Electronics (CE) product market, which includes DVD players, audio/video receivers, and other home theater CE products, and, as a result, there is little room for us to further penetrate such markets. Lower sales of products incorporating our technologies could occur for a number of reasons. Changes in consumer tastes or trends, rapidly evolving technology, changes in industry standards or adverse changes in business and economic conditions, may adversely affect our licensing revenue. Increasing market saturation, durability of products in the marketplace, competing products, and alternate consumer entertainment options could adversely affect demand for new products incorporating our technologies.

To the extent that sales of PCs with Dolby technologies decline, our licensing revenue will be adversely affected.

Over the last several years, PC manufacturers frequently included DVD playback functionality, which included Dolby technologies, as part of the software applications included in their products. Initially, DVD playback functionality was included in software licensed by independent software vendors, or ISVs. Starting in our fiscal 2007, Microsoft introduced its Windows Vista operating system, which included DVD playback functionality in two of its six editions. Even though those editions of Microsoft’s Windows Vista operating system included DVD playback, many major PC manufacturers continued to include the additional ISV DVD software applications.

Windows 7, Microsoft’s newest operating system, became available in October 2009. Windows 7 includes DVD playback in four of its six available editions, including the Professional and Enterprise editions aimed at business customers. There are risks and uncertainties associated with this opportunity. Due in part to Windows 7 DVD playback enhancements and pricing pressure, some PC manufacturers have excluded, and we expect others in the future will exclude, ISV DVD software applications on PCs that include Windows 7. Additionally, it is uncertain at what pace consumer and business customers will migrate from their current operating systems to the

Windows 7 operating system and what the adoption rate of the editions with Dolby technologies will be. In addition, consumers are increasingly purchasing lower priced PCs, particularly netbooks and tablets, which do not have Dolby technologies. Consumers may elect to purchase these lower priced PCs instead of computers with DVD playback functionality and Dolby technologies. Future shipments of PCs with Dolby technologies could also decline. If any of the foregoing occurs, our licensing revenue will be adversely affected.

We continue to be cautious regarding future macroeconomic conditions and their potential for suppressed consumer demand in the markets in which we license our technologies and sell our products. Our business could be materially adversely affected by changes in macroeconomic conditions, because our technologies are incorporated into entertainment-oriented products, which are generally discretionary goods, such as DVD players, Blu-ray Disc players, PCs, digital televisions, mobile devices, set-top boxes, home–theaters–in–a–box, camcorders, portable media devices, gaming systems, audio/video receivers, and in-car entertainment systems. The global economic environment has adversely affected consumer confidence, disposable income, and spending. While we cannot predict future macroeconomic conditions, these conditions may persist or worsen. Furthermore, deteriorating or continued weakness in economic conditions result in a greater likelihood that more of our licensees and customers will become delinquent on their obligations to us or be unable to pay, which in turn, could result in a higher level of write-offs, all of which would adversely affect our earnings. Moreover, deteriorating economic conditions and other factors may result in increased underreporting and non-reporting of royalty bearing revenue by our licensees as well as increased unauthorized use of our technologies, which would adversely affect our earnings.

Our future success depends, in part, upon the growth of new and existing markets for our technologies and our ability to develop and adapt our technologies for those markets. If those markets do not grow or we are not able to develop successful products for them, our business prospects could be limited.

The future growth of our licensing revenue will depend, in part, upon the growth of, and our successful participation in, new and existing markets for our technologies. For example, growth of our broadcast revenue is dependent upon continued global growth of digital television broadcasting and the adoption of our technologies into emerging digital broadcast standards. Another example is that our PC revenue is dependent upon the growth of the PC market and the continued adoption of our technologies into PC operating systems as well as the adoption of our technologies into emerging types of devices such as tablets.

Our ability to penetrate new and existing markets for our technologies depends on increased consumer demand for products that contain our technologies, which may not occur. Some of these markets are ones in which we have not previously participated, and we may not be able to adapt adequately our business and our technologies to consumer demand. In addition, even when our technologies are adopted as industry standards for a particular market, such market may not fully develop.

If new and existing markets for our technologies do not develop or consumer demand for products that contain our technologies does not grow, our business and prospects would be materially adversely affected.

If we do not develop and deliver innovative technologies in response to industry and technology changes, our business could decline.

The markets for our products and the markets for digital entertainment products using our licensed technologies are characterized by rapid change and technological evolution that can render our technologies and products obsolete or unmarketable. The process of developing new technologies is complex and uncertain. We will need to expend considerable resources on research and development, or acquisitions, in the future in order to design and deliver innovative entertainment products and technologies. Despite our efforts, we may not be able to develop, or acquire, and effectively market new products, technologies and services in a timely manner that competitively address the needs of the changing marketplace. For example, we cannot ensure that Dolby Axon or Dolby Volume, will address the needs of the marketplace, be effectively marketed or be successful technologies.

In addition, we may not correctly identify new or changing market trends at an early enough stage to capitalize on market opportunities. For example, while we view the continued advancements in online and mobile content delivery as an area of opportunity if we are not able to competitively address the needs of the changing online and mobile markets our ability to generate revenue from those markets would be limited while our revenue from DVD and Blu-ray Disc players could decline. At times such changes can be dramatic, such as the shift from VHS tapes to DVDs for consumer playback of movies in homes and elsewhere. Our future success depends to a great extent on our ability to develop, or acquire, and deliver innovative technologies in a timely manner that are widely adopted in response to changes in the entertainment industry and that are compatible with the technologies or products introduced by other entertainment industry participants.

Sales of component DVD players have declined significantly and we expect them to decline further. To the extent that sales of component DVD players continue to decline or alternative technologies in which we do not participate replace DVDs or Blu-ray Disc as a dominant medium for consumer video entertainment, our licensing revenue will be adversely affected.

In the past, growth in our revenue had been the result, in large part, of the rapid growth in sales of component DVD players incorporating our technologies. However, as the markets for DVD players have matured, sales of component DVD players generally have declined significantly and we expect future sales of component consumer DVD players generally to continue to decline. While revenue from Blu-ray Disc players offset component standard definition DVD player revenue declines in fiscal 2010, future revenue from Blu-ray Disc player may not offset future declines in revenue from standard definition DVD players. A shift in consumer content consumption from DVD and Blu-ray Disc to internet content consumption through connected televisions and set-top boxes, could result in declines in revenue from DVD and Blu-ray Disc players. Such declines would adversely affect our licensing revenue. In addition, if new technologies or distribution channels are developed that compete with or replace DVD and Blu-ray Disc players as dominant media for consumer video entertainment, we may not be able to develop complementary technologies for and generate revenue from those new technologies or distribution channels. Furthermore, new technologies or distribution channels may be less profitable for us than DVD and Blu-ray Disc players. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our operating results may fluctuate depending upon the timing of when we receive royalty reports from our licensees and of the satisfaction of our revenue recognition criteria.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate depending upon the timing of when we receive royalty reports from our licensees and of the satisfaction of our revenue recognition criteria. We recognize license revenue only after we receive royalty reports from our licensees regarding the shipment of their products that incorporate our technologies and after all other revenue recognition criteria are met. As a result, the timing of our revenue depends upon the timing of our receipt of those reports and when we cannot determine the creditworthiness of our customers, the receipt of cash. In addition, it is not uncommon for royalty reports to include positive or negative corrective or retroactive royalties that cover extended periods of time. Furthermore, there have been times in the past when we have recognized an unusually large amount of licensing revenue from a licensee in a given quarter because not all of our revenue recognition criteria were met in prior periods. This can result in a large amount of licensing revenue from a licensee being recorded in a given quarter that is not necessarily indicative of the amounts of licensing revenue to be received from that licensee in future quarters, thus causing fluctuations in our operating results. For example, in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 we recognized a total of approximately $21.6 million in licensing revenue from three licensees related to royalties on shipments in prior periods. Moreover, there have been times in the past when we have not recognized large amounts of products and services revenue in a given quarter, or over several quarters, because not all of our revenue recognition criteria were met in prior periods. For example, in fiscal 2009, we recognized approximately $38.6 million of previously deferred digital cinema product revenue, including $25.1 million relating to products sold in years prior to fiscal 2009.

Inaccurate licensee royalty reporting and unauthorized use of our intellectual property could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We generate revenue primarily from digital entertainment product manufacturers and software vendors who license our technologies and incorporate those technologies in their products. Our license agreements generally obligate our licensees to pay us a specified royalty for every product they ship that incorporates our technologies, and we rely on our licensees to accurately report their shipments. We calculate our license fees, prepare our financial reports, projections, and budgets, and direct our sales and product development efforts based on these reports we receive from our licensees. However, we have difficulty independently determining whether or not our licensees are reporting shipments accurately. Independently determining that our licensees have reported shipments accurately is particularly problematic with respect to software incorporating our technologies because software can be copied relatively easily and we do not have easy ways to determine how many copies have been made. Most of our license agreements permit us to audit our licensees’ records, but audits are generally expensive, time consuming, and potentially detrimental to our ongoing business relationships with our licensees. In the past, licensees, particularly in emerging economies, such as China, have understated or failed to report the number of products incorporating our technologies that they shipped, and we have not been able to collect and recognize revenue to which we were entitled. We expect that we will continue to experience understatement and non-reporting of royalties by our licensees, which could adversely affect our operating results. Conversely, to the extent that our licensees overstate the number of products incorporating our technologies, or report the products under the wrong categories, corrections of prior reports could result in reductions of royalty revenue in subsequent periods. To the extent that our licensees more closely scrutinize their past or future licensing statements, we may receive more royalty statements that contain corrections of prior reports.

We also have often experienced, and expect to continue to experience, problems with non-licensee digital entertainment product manufacturers and software vendors, particularly in emerging economies, such as China, incorporating our technologies or incorporating our technologies and trademarks into their products without our authorization and without paying us any licensing fees. This form of piracy is facilitated when manufacturers of ICs containing our technologies sell ICs with our technologies to third parties who are not our system licensees and not reporting these sales. As emerging economies transition from analog to digital content we expect to experience increased problems with this form of piracy. Increased unauthorized use of our intellectual property would adversely affect our operating results.

If we do not expand our business into non-sound technologies, our future growth could be limited.

Our future growth will depend, in part, upon our expansion into areas beyond sound technologies. For example, in addition to our digital cinema initiative, we are exploring other areas that facilitate delivery of digital entertainment, such as technologies for processing digital moving images. We will need to spend considerable resources on research and development or acquisitions in the future in order to deliver innovative non-sound technologies. However, we have limited experience in non-sound technology markets and, despite our efforts, we cannot predict whether we will be successful in developing, or acquiring, and marketing non-sound products, technologies, and services. We will face significant risks in integrating non-sound businesses that we acquire into our business.

In addition, many of the non-sound technology markets which we are targeting are relatively new and may not develop as we currently anticipate. Moreover, although we believe that many of the technological advances we may develop or acquire for digital cinema and 3D digital cinema may have applicability in other areas, such as 3D for broadcasting or CE products, we may not be able to achieve these anticipated benefits in these other markets. A number of competitors and potential competitors may develop non-sound technologies similar to those that we develop or acquire, some of which may provide advantages over our products, technologies, and services. Some of these competitors have much greater experience and expertise than we do in the non-sound fields we may enter. The non-sound products, technologies, and services we expect to market may not achieve or sustain market acceptance, may not meet industry needs, and may not be accepted as industry standards. If we are

unsuccessful in selling non-sound products, technologies, and services, the future growth of our business may be limited. In addition, our efforts to enter or strengthen our positions in non-sound markets may be tied to the success of specific programs.

If our products and technologies are not adopted as industry standards, our business prospects could be limited and our operating results could be adversely affected.

The entertainment industry depends upon industry standards to ensure the compatibility of its content across a wide variety of entertainment systems and products. Accordingly, we make significant efforts to design our products and technologies to address capability, quality, and cost considerations so that they either meet, or, more importantly, are adopted as, industry standards across the broad range of entertainment industry markets in which we participate, as well as the markets in which we hope to compete in the future. To have our products and technologies adopted as industry standards, we must convince a broad spectrum of professional organizations throughout the world, as well as our major customers and licensees who are members of such organizations, to adopt them as such and to ensure that other industry standards are consistent with our products and technologies. If our technologies are not adopted or do not remain as industry standards, our business, operating results, and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. We expect that meeting, maintaining, and establishing industry standard technologies will be critical to our business in the future. In addition, the market for broadcast technologies has traditionally been heavily based upon industry standards, often set by governments or other regulatory bodies, and we expect this to be the case in the future. If our technologies are not chosen as industry standards for broadcasting in particular geographic areas, this could adversely affect our ability to compete in these markets.

It may be more difficult for us, in the future, to have our technologies adopted as individual industry standards to the extent that entertainment industry participants collaborate on the development of industry standard technologies.

Increasingly, standards-setting organizations are adopting or establishing technology standards for use in a wide range of digital entertainment products. As a result, it is more difficult for individual companies to have their technologies adopted wholesale as an informal industry standard. We call this type of standard a “de facto” industry standard, meaning that the standard is not explicitly mandated by any industry standards-setting body but is nonetheless widely adopted. In addition, increasingly there are a large number of companies, including ones that typically compete against one another, involved in the development of new technologies for use in consumer entertainment products. As a result, these companies often license their collective intellectual property rights as a group, making it more difficult for any single company to have its technologies adopted widely as a de facto industry standard or to have its technologies adopted as an exclusive, explicit industry standard for digital entertainment products.

Even if our technologies are adopted as an industry standard for a particular market, market participants may not widely adopt our technologies.

Even when a standards-setting body mandates our technologies for a particular market, which we call an “explicit” industry standard, our technologies may not be the sole technologies adopted for that market as an industry standard. Accordingly, our operating results depend upon participants in that market choosing to adopt our technologies instead of competitive technologies that also may be acceptable under such standard. For example, the continued growth of our revenue from the broadcast market will depend upon both the continued global adoption of digital television generally and the choice to use our technologies where it is an optional industry standard.

The licensing of patents constitutes a significant source of our revenue. If we do not replace expiring patents with new patents or proprietary technologies, our revenue could decline.

We hold patents covering much of the technologies that we license to system licensees, and our licensing revenue is tied in large part to the life of those patents. Our right to receive royalties related to our patents

terminates with the expiration of the last patent covering the relevant technologies in a particular country. Accordingly, to the extent that we do not replace licensing revenue from technologies covered by expiring patents with licensing revenue based on new patents and proprietary technologies, our revenue could decline.

As of September 24, 2010, we had nearly 1,900 individual issued patents and over 2,050 pending patent applications in nearly 45 jurisdictions throughout the world. Our issued patents are scheduled to expire at various times through July 2029. Of these, one patent is scheduled to expire in the remainder of calendar year 2010, 34 patents are scheduled to expire in calendar year 2011, 52 patents are scheduled to expire in calendar year 2012, and 31 patents are scheduled to expire in calendar year 2013. We derive our licensing revenue principally from our Dolby Digital technologies. Patents relating to our Dolby Digital technologies have begun to expire and the remaining patents relating to this technology generally expire between now and 2017, and additional patents relating to our Dolby Digital Plus technologies, an extension of Dolby Digital, expire between 2018 and 2026. In addition, the remaining patents relating to Dolby Digital Live technologies, an extension of Dolby Digital, are scheduled to expire in 2021.

We face significant competition in various markets, and if we are unable to compete successfully, our business will suffer.

The markets for entertainment industry technologies are highly competitive, and we face competitive threats and pricing pressure in our markets. Competitors for our licensed technologies include: Audyssey Laboratories, DTS, Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits, Microsoft, Philips, RealNetworks, Sonic Solutions, Sony, SRS Labs, and Thomson. Competitors for our products include: Barco, Doremi, GDC, IMAX, MasterImage 3D, NEC, Panavision, QSC Audio Products, Qube Cinema, REALD, Sony, Technicolor, Texas Instruments, USL, and XpanD. In addition, other companies, including exhibitors and film studios, may develop their own 3D or digital cinema technologies in the future. Competitors for our services include DTS and Sony. In addition, other companies may become competitors in the future. Consumers may perceive the quality of the audio experience produced by some of our competitors’ technologies to be equivalent or superior to the audio experience produced by our technologies. In addition, some of our current and/or future competitors may have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and other resources than we do, or may have more experience or advantages in the markets in which they compete. For example, some of our current or potential competitors may have an advantage over us in the market for online content because of their greater experience and presence in that market. In addition, some of our current or potential competitors may be able to offer integrated system solutions in markets for sound or non-sound entertainment technologies, including audio, video, and rights management technologies related to PCs or the internet, which could make competing technologies that we develop unnecessary. By offering an integrated system solution, these potential competitors also may be able to offer competing technologies at lower prices than our technologies, which could adversely affect our operating results. Further, many of the digital entertainment products that include our sound technologies also include sound technologies developed by our competitors. Several competitors have introduced digital cinema products which support the presentation of movies with higher resolution “4K” digital cinema projectors. Dolby currently does not offer a 4K digital cinema product. As a result, we must invest significant resources in research and development in order to enhance our technologies and our existing products and services and introduce new high quality technologies, products, and services to meet the wide variety of such competitive pressures. Our business will suffer if we fail to do so successfully.

Our business and prospects depend on the strength of our brand, and if we do not maintain and strengthen our brand, our business will be materially harmed.

Maintaining and strengthening the Dolby brand is critical to maintaining and expanding our licensing, products, and services, as well as to our ability to enter new markets for our sound and other technologies. Our continued success depends, in part, on our reputation for providing high quality products, services, and technologies across a wide range of entertainment industries, including the CE products, PC, broadcast and gaming industries. If we fail to promote and maintain the Dolby brand successfully in licensing, products or services, our business and prospects will suffer. Moreover, we believe that the likelihood that our technologies

will be adopted as industry standards in various markets and for various applications depends, in part, upon the strength of our brand, because professional organizations and industry participants are more likely to accept, as an industry standard, technologies developed by a well-respected and well-known brand. Our ability to maintain and strengthen our brand will depend heavily on our ability to develop innovative technologies for the entertainment industry, to successfully enter into new markets, and to provide high quality products and services, which we may not do successfully. Establishing brand recognition is particularly challenging in newer markets in which we have limited experience.

Our licensing of industry standard technologies can be subject to limitations that could adversely affect our business and prospects.

When a standards-setting body mandates our technologies as explicit industry standards, we generally must agree to license such technologies on a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory basis, which could limit our control over the use of these technologies. In these situations, we must often limit the royalty rates we charge for these technologies, which could adversely affect our revenue. Furthermore, we may be unable to limit to whom we license such technologies, and may be unable to restrict many terms of the license. From time to time we may be subject to claims that our licenses of our industry standard technologies may not conform to the requirements of the standards-setting body. Private parties have raised this type of issue with us in the past. Allegations such as these could be asserted in private actions seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief, or in regulatory actions. Claimants in such cases could seek to restrict or change our licensing practices or our ability to license our technologies in ways that could injure our reputation and otherwise materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, and prospects.

We face risks in conducting business in emerging economies, such as China, particularly due to the limited recognition and enforcement of intellectual property and contractual rights in these countries.

We believe that various trends will increase our exposure to the risks of conducting business in emerging economies. For example, we expect digital entertainment product manufacturing in emerging economies, such as China, to increase due to the availability of lower manufacturing costs as compared to those of other industrial countries and the continued industry shift by discount retailers towards lower end DVD and more recently Blu-ray Disc player offerings. We also believe that our sales of products and services in emerging economies will expand in the future to the extent that the use of digital surround sound technologies increases in these countries, including in movies and broadcast television. We further expect that the sale of products incorporating our technologies will increase in emerging economies to the extent that consumers there become more affluent. We face many risks associated with operating in these emerging economies, in large part due to limited recognition and enforcement of contractual and intellectual property rights. As a result, we may experience difficulties in enforcing our intellectual property rights in these emerging economies, where intellectual property rights are not as respected as they are in the United States, Japan, and Europe. We believe that it is critical that we strengthen existing relationships and develop new relationships with entertainment industry participants worldwide to increase our ability to enforce our intellectual property and contractual rights without relying solely on the legal systems in the countries in which we operate. If we are unable to develop, maintain, and strengthen these relationships, our revenue from these countries could be adversely affected.

Our licensing revenue depends in large part upon semiconductor manufacturers incorporating our technologies into integrated circuits, or ICs, for sale to our system licensees and if, for any reason, our technologies are not incorporated in these ICs or fewer ICs are sold that incorporate our technologies, our operating results would be adversely affected.

Our licensing revenue from system licensees depends in large part upon the availability of integrated circuits, or ICs, that implement our technologies. IC manufacturers incorporate our technologies into these ICs, which are then incorporated in digital entertainment products. We do not manufacture these ICs, but rather depend on IC manufacturers to develop, produce, and then sell them to system licensees. We do not control the

IC manufacturers’ decisions whether or not to incorporate our technologies into their ICs, and we do not control their product development or commercialization efforts nor predict their success. As a result, if these IC manufacturers are unable or unwilling, for any reason, to implement our technologies into their ICs, or if, for any reason, they sell fewer ICs incorporating our technologies, our operating results will be adversely affected. Furthermore, we rely on IC manufacturers to report to us the number of ICs sold that incorporate our technologies so that we can track the accuracy of system licensee reporting. IC manufacturers have sold ICs with our technologies to third parties that are not system licensees, resulting in lost revenue.

Pricing pressures on the system licensees who incorporate our technologies into their products could limit the licensing fees we charge for our technologies, which could adversely affect our revenue.

The markets for the digital entertainment products in which our technologies are incorporated are intensely competitive and price sensitive. Retail prices for digital entertainment products that include our sound technologies, such as DVD players and home theater systems, have decreased significantly, and we expect prices to decrease for the foreseeable future. In response, manufacturers have sought to reduce their product costs, which can result in downward pressure on the licensing fees we charge our customers who incorporate our technologies into the digital entertainment products that they sell. Further, while we have contractual rights with many of our licensees for cost of living adjustments to our royalty rights, we may not be able to negotiate those terms in our contracts with existing and new licensees. Moreover, downward cost of living adjustments would result in declines in the licensing fees that we charge. A decline in, or the modification or loss of the contractual right to increase, the licensing fees we charge could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

We have in the past, and may in the future be, subject to legal claims related to our intellectual property rights claims, which are costly to defend, could require us to pay damages, and could limit our ability to use particular technologies in the future.

Companies in the technology and entertainment industries own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We have faced such claims in the past and we expect to face similar claims in the future.

Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, expensive to litigate or settle, and could divert management resources and attention. In the past we have settled claims relating to infringement allegations and agreed to make payments in connection with such settlements. We expect that similar claims will be asserted against us in the future in the ordinary course of our business. An adverse determination in any intellectual property claim could require that we pay damages or stop using technologies found to be in violation of a third party’s rights and could prevent us from offering our products and services to others. In order to avoid these restrictions, we may have to seek a license for the technology. This license may not be available on reasonable terms, could require us to pay significant royalties, and may significantly increase our operating expenses. The technologies also may not be available for license to us at all. As a result, we may be required to develop alternative non-infringing technologies, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technologies for any aspects of our business found to be infringing, we may be forced to limit our product and service offerings and may be unable to compete effectively. In some instances, we have contractually agreed to provide indemnifications to licensees relating to our intellectual property. In addition, at times in the past, we have chosen to defend our licensees from third party intellectual property infringement claims even where such defense was not contractually required, and we may choose to take on such defense in the future. Any of these results could harm our brand, our operating results, and our financial condition.

In addition, from time to time we are engaged in disputes regarding the licensing of our intellectual property rights, including matters related to our royalty rates and other terms of our licensing arrangements. These types of disputes can be asserted by our customers or prospective customers or by other third parties as part of negotiations with us or in private actions seeking monetary damages or injunctive relief, or in regulatory actions. In the past, licensees have threatened to initiate litigation against us regarding our licensing royalty rate practices including our adherence to

licensing on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms and potential antitrust claims. Damages and requests for injunctive relief asserted in claims like these could be material, and could have a significant impact on our business. Any disputes with our customers or potential customers or other third parties could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects.

We face many risks in the 3D cinema market which may affect our ability to successfully participate in that market, including, but not limited to the following:

If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our ability to compete profitably in the 3D cinema market may be adversely affected.

Our inability to deploy our digital cinema servers in significant numbers in the transition to digital cinema, coupled with the price of our products, could limit our future prospects in the digital cinema market and could materially and adversely affect our business.

A small percentage of theaters have adopted digital cinema for the distribution and exhibition of movies. A number of companies offer competing products for digital cinema that exhibitors may perceive to be potentially advantageous to our products. Some of these competing products are priced lower than our products or offer features, such as support for 4K presentation. At least one competitor has a significantly greater installed base of its competing digital cinema playback servers than we do and another competitor has a significantly greater installed base of its competing 3D products than we do, either of which could limit our eventual share of the digital cinema market and materially and adversely affect our operating results. As the market for digital cinema has grown, we have faced more pricing and other competitive pressures than we have historically experienced for our traditional cinema products. As a result, we have implemented and may have to continue to implement pricing strategies which will have an adverse impact on our products gross margins in the future.

If funding for the broader adoption of digital cinema is not available or if the market for digital cinema develops more slowly than expected, our future prospects could be limited and our business could be materially and adversely affected.

At present only a small percentage of movie theaters have been converted to digital cinema, and we expect the broad conversion of theaters to digital cinema technologies, if it occurs, to be a multi year process due to financial

obstacles. Until recently, macroeconomic conditions have limited the availability of funding for cinema rollouts. Although in March 2010 certain major exhibitors announced the availability of financing for digital cinema upgrades in U.S. theaters, those exhibitors may not receive funding for further upgrades and other exhibitors may not receive funding at all. If funding is not available on favorable terms or at all, the broader adoption of digital cinema could be delayed further. Further, we cannot predict how quickly digital cinema will become widely adopted. If the demand for digital cinema equipment develops more slowly than expected the broad adoption of digital cinema will continue to be delayed which could adversely affect our revenue.

Acquisition activities could result in operating difficulties, dilution to our stockholders and other harmful consequences.

We have evaluated, and expect to continue to evaluate, a wide array of possible strategic transactions, including acquisitions. We consider these types of transactions in connection with our efforts to expand our business beyond sound technologies to other technologies related to the delivery of digital entertainment. Although we cannot predict whether or not we will complete any such acquisition or other transactions in the future, any of these transactions could be material in relation to our market capitalization, financial condition or results of operations. The process of integrating an acquired company, business or technology may create unforeseen difficulties and expenditures. The areas where we may face risks in integrating acquired businesses include:

Foreign acquisitions involve unique risks in addition to those mentioned above, including those related to integration of operations across different geographies, cultures, and languages, currency risks, and risks associated with the particular economic, political, and regulatory environment in specific countries. Also, the anticipated benefit of our acquisitions may not materialize. Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, or amortization expenses, or write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our operating results or financial condition. Future acquisitions may also require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Moreover, acquisitions may have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations, including a potential adverse impact on our gross margins.

Changes to our enterprise resource planning and other key software applications could cause unexpected problems to occur and disrupt the management of our business.

We recently replaced our enterprise resource planning (ERP) system as well as other key software applications used in our global operations. Our ERP system and related applications are integral to our ability to accurately and efficiently maintain our books and records, manage royalty and product revenue streams, record our transactions, provide critical information to our management, and prepare our financial statements. Any unexpected difficulties resulting from these replacement efforts, could adversely affect our operating results and the accuracy and timely reporting of those results.

Third parties from whom we license technologies may challenge our calculation of the royalties we owe them for inclusion of their technologies in our products and licensed technologies, which could adversely affect our operating results, business, and prospects.

In some cases, the products we sell and the technologies we license to our customers include intellectual property that we have licensed from third parties. Our agreements with these third parties generally require us to pay them royalties for that use, and give the third parties the right to audit our calculation of those royalties. A third party may disagree with our interpretation of the terms of a license agreement or, as a result of an audit, a third party could challenge the accuracy of our calculation. We have in the past been, and may in the future be, involved in disputes with third party technology licensors regarding license terms.

A successful challenge by a third party could increase the amount of royalties we have to pay to the third party, decrease our gross margin, and adversely affect our operating results. Such a challenge could result in the termination of the license agreement which would impair our ability to continue to use and re-license intellectual property from that third party which, in turn, could adversely affect our business and prospects.

Our relationships with entertainment industry participants are particularly important to our products, services, and technology licensing, and if we do not maintain such relationships our business could be materially harmed.

If we fail to maintain and expand our relationships with a broad range of participants throughout the entertainment industry, including film studios, broadcasters, video game designers, music producers, mobile content producers, and manufacturers of digital entertainment products, our business and prospects could be materially harmed. Relationships have historically played an important role in the entertainment industries that we serve. For example, sales of our products and services are particularly dependent upon our relationships with the major film studios and broadcasters, and licensing of our technologies is particularly dependent upon our relationships with system licensees, software vendors, and integrated circuit, or IC, manufacturers. If we fail to maintain and strengthen these relationships, these entertainment industry participants may be more likely not to purchase and use our products, services, and technologies, or create content incorporating our technologies, which could materially harm our business and prospects. In addition to directly providing substantially all of our revenue, these relationships are also critical to our ability to have our technologies adopted as industry standards. In addition, if major industry participants form strategic relationships that exclude us, whether in products, services, or licensing, our business and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

We have limited or no patent protection for some of our technologies in particular countries, including China, Taiwan, and India, which could limit our ability to grow our business in these markets.

We have a relatively limited number of issued patents in particular countries, including China, Taiwan, and India. For example, in China and Taiwan we have only limited patent protection, especially with respect to our Dolby Digital technologies. In India, we have no issued patents for Dolby Digital technologies. Consequently, maintaining or growing our licensing revenue in these emerging countries will depend on our ability to obtain patent rights in these countries for existing and new technologies, which is uncertain. Moreover, because of the limitations of the legal systems in many countries, the effectiveness of patents obtained or that may in the future be obtained, if any, is likewise uncertain.

We face diverse risks in our international business, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We are dependent on international sales for a substantial amount of our total revenue. For fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, revenue from outside the United States was 66%, 65%, and 66% of our total revenue, respectively. We expect that international and export sales will represent a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. This future revenue will depend to a large extent on the continued use and expansion of our technologies in entertainment industries worldwide. Increased worldwide use of our technologies is also an important factor in our future growth.

Due to our reliance on sales to customers outside the United States, we are subject to the risks of conducting business internationally, including:

In addition, a significant number of our employees are located outside the United States. This means we have exposure to changes in foreign laws governing our relationships with our employees, which could have a direct impact on our operating costs. Expansion into international markets has required, and will require, significant management attention and resources. Moreover, local laws and customs in many countries differ significantly from those in the United States. We incur additional legal compliance costs associated with our international operations and could become subject to legal penalties in foreign countries if we do not comply with local laws and regulations, which may be substantially different from those in the United States. In many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, it is common to engage in business practices that are prohibited by United States regulations applicable to us such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and U.S. export controls. Although we implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and U.S. export controls, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, distributors, dealers, and agents will not take actions in violation of our policies or these regulations. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies, could have an adverse effect on our business.

Revisions to patent laws and regulations in the U.S. and abroad may adversely impact our ability to obtain, license and enforce our patent rights.

Our licensing business depends in part on the uniform and consistent treatment of patent rights in the U.S. and abroad. Changes to the patent laws and regulations in the U.S. and abroad may limit our ability to obtain, license, and enforce our rights. For example, in recent years the U.S. Congress has considered a number of changes to the patent laws including changes to the calculation of damages for patent infringement. In addition, court and administrative rulings may interpret existing patent laws and regulations in ways that adversely affect our ability to obtain, license, and enforce our patents. For example, in recent years the U.S. Supreme Court has issued rulings on the standard for determining whether an invention is obvious, which is a key issue when assessing patentability, the ability of a patent holder to obtain injunctive relief against infringers, and the ability of patent licensees to challenge the patents under which they are licensed. The ruling concerning injunctions may

make it more difficult, under some circumstances, for us to obtain injunctive relief against a party that has been found to infringe one or more of our patents, and the ruling regarding patent challenges by licensees could potentially make it easier for our licensees to challenge our patents even though they have already agreed to take a license.

Our ability to develop proprietary technologies in markets in which “open standards” are adopted may be limited, which could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue.

Standards-setting bodies, such as those for digital cinema technologies, may require the use of so-called “open standards,” meaning that the technologies necessary to meet those standards are publicly available. The use of open standards may reduce our opportunity to generate revenue, as open standards technologies are based upon non-proprietary technology platforms in which no one company maintains ownership over the dominant technologies.

Events and conditions in the cinema and broadcast industries may affect sales of our cinema products and other services.

Sales of our cinema products and services tend to fluctuate based on the underlying trends in the cinema industry. For example, when box office receipts for the cinema industry increase, we have typically seen sales of our cinema products increase as well, as cinema owners are more likely to build new theaters and upgrade existing theaters with our more advanced products when they are doing well financially. Conversely, when box office receipts are down cinema owners tend to scale back on plans to expand or upgrade their systems. Our cinema product sales are also subject to fluctuations based on events and conditions in the cinema exhibition industry generally that may or may not be tied to box office receipts in particular time periods. For example, the growth in piracy of motion pictures adversely affects the construction of new screens, the renovation of existing theaters, and the continued production of new motion pictures. Technological advances and the conversion of motion pictures from film to digital have made it easier to create, transmit, and “share” high quality unauthorized copies of motion pictures, including on pirated DVDs and on the internet. On the other hand, our services revenue, both in the United States and internationally, is tied to the number of films being made by major film studios and independent filmmakers. A number of factors can affect the number of films that are produced, including strikes and work stoppages within the cinema industry, as well as by the tax incentive arrangements that many foreign governments provide filmmakers to promote local filmmaking.

The demand for our cinema products and services could decline as the film industry adopts digital cinema.

Although only a small percentage of theaters have adopted digital cinema technologies for the distribution and exhibition of motion pictures, the number of cinema exhibitors adopting digital cinema for new theater construction or existing theater upgrades continues to grow. As exhibitors have constructed new theaters or upgraded existing theaters they have generally chosen digital cinema over traditional film cinema and we expect this trend to continue. Digital cinema, which is based on open standards, does not include our proprietary audio technologies. As the film industry continues to adopt digital cinema, the demand for our traditional cinema products and services has declined significantly and we anticipate that the demand for film based products will decline in future periods. Furthermore, exhibitors adopting digital cinema can choose from multiple digital cinema playback servers other than ours, none of which contain our technologies. A continued decrease in the demand for our traditional film cinema products and services that is not accompanied by a meaningful increase in revenue from digital cinema products and services would adversely affect our revenue stream from the cinema industry.

In addition, a decrease in the demand for our products and services could adversely affect licensing of our consumer technologies, because the strength of our brand and our ability to use professional product developments to introduce new technologies, which can later be licensed to consumer product manufacturers and service providers, would be impaired. If, in such circumstances, we are unable to adapt our products and services or introduce new products for the digital cinema market successfully, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Our stock repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time, which may result in a decrease in our stock price.

In July 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved an additional $300.0 million for our stock repurchase program, whereby we may continue to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock. This repurchase program may reduce the public float of shares available for trading on a daily basis. Depending on market conditions and other factors, such purchases may be limited, suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. There can be no assurance that we will buy additional shares of our Class A common stock under our stock repurchase program or that any future repurchases will have a positive impact on our stock price or earnings per share. Important factors that could cause us to discontinue our share repurchases include, among others, unfavorable market conditions, the market price of our Class A common stock, the nature of other investment opportunities presented to us from time to time, our ability to make appropriate, timely, and beneficial decisions as to when, how, and whether to purchase shares under the stock repurchase program, and the availability of funds necessary to continue purchasing stock. If we curtail our repurchase program, our stock price may be negatively affected.

Fluctuations in our operating results and other factors may contribute to the volatility of the market price of our stock.

A number of factors, many of which are outside our control, may cause or contribute to significant fluctuations in our quarterly and annual revenue and operating results. These fluctuations may make financial planning and forecasting more difficult. In addition, these fluctuations may result in unanticipated decreases in our available cash, which could negatively impact our business and prospects. As described more fully below, these fluctuations also could increase the volatility of our stock price. In addition to the other factors discussed in this Risk Factors section, factors that may cause or contribute to fluctuations in our operating results and revenue or the volatility of the market price of our stock include:

One or more of the foregoing or other factors may cause our operating expenses to be disproportionately higher or lower or may cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate significantly in any particular quarterly or annual period. Such fluctuations in our operating expenses or financial performance could contribute to the volatility of the market price of our stock. Results from prior periods are thus not necessarily indicative of the results of future periods.

Changes in tax rates and exposure for additional income tax liabilities or adverse outcomes resulting from examinations of our tax returns could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Our future effective tax rates could be favorably or unfavorably affected by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, the geographic mix of our revenue, or by changes in tax laws or their interpretation. We file income tax returns in the United States and in several U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. For example, our income taxes could be adversely affected by:

In addition, we are subject to the periodic examination of our income tax returns by tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance, however, that the outcomes from these continuous examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Additionally, due

to the evolving nature of tax rules combined with the large number of jurisdictions in which we operate, it is possible that our estimates of our tax liability and the realizability of our deferred tax assets could change in the future, which may result in additional tax liabilities and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

If securities or industry analysts publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or if our operating results do not meet or exceed their projections, our stock price could decline.

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us or our industry downgrade our stock or the stock of other companies in our industry, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or industry, or if our operating results do not meet or exceed their projections, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

Any inability to protect our intellectual property rights could reduce the value of our products, services, and brand.

Our business is dependent upon our patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights. Licensing revenue represented 84%, 83%, and 77% of our total revenue in the fiscal years 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. Effective intellectual property rights protection, however, may not be available under the laws of every country in which our products and services and those of our licensees are distributed. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business or our ability to compete. In addition, protecting our intellectual property rights is costly and time consuming. We have taken steps in the past to enforce our intellectual property rights and expect do so in the future. However, it may not be practicable or cost effective for us to enforce our intellectual property rights fully, particularly in some countries or where the initiation of a claim might harm our business relationships. For example, we have many times experienced, and expect to continue to experience, problems with digital entertainment product manufacturers incorporating our technologies into their products without our authorization and with implementation licensees selling ICs with our technologies to unlicensed digital entertainment product manufacturers that are not system licensees. If we are unable to successfully identify and stop unauthorized use of our intellectual property, we could experience increased operational and enforcement costs, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We generally seek patent protection for our innovations. However, it is possible that some of these innovations may not be protectable. In addition, given the costs of obtaining patent protection, we may choose not to protect particular innovations that later turn out to be important. Moreover, we have limited or no patent protection in particular foreign jurisdictions. For example, in China and Taiwan we have only limited patent protection, especially with respect to our Dolby Digital technologies, and in India we have no issued patents. Even where we do have patent protection, the scope of such protection may be insufficient to prevent third parties from designing around our particular patent claims. Furthermore, there is always the possibility that an issued patent may later be found to be invalid or unenforceable. Moreover, we seek to maintain select intellectual property as trade secrets. These trade secrets could be compromised by third parties, or intentionally or accidentally by our employees, which would cause us to lose the competitive advantage resulting from them.

Some of our customers are also our current or potential competitors, and if those customers were to choose to use their competing technologies rather than ours, our business and operating results would be adversely affected.

We face competitive risks in situations where our customers are also current or potential competitors. For example, Sony and Microsoft are significant licensee customers and Sony is a significant purchaser of our broadcast products and services, but Sony and Microsoft are also competitors with respect to some of our

consumer, broadcast, and cinema technologies. To the extent that our customers choose to utilize competing technologies they have developed or in which they have an interest, rather than use our technologies, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Surround sound technologies could be treated as a commodity in the future, which could adversely affect our business, operating results, and prospects.

We believe that the success we have had licensing our surround sound technologies to system licensees is due, in part, to the strength of our brand and the perception that our technologies provide a high quality solution for surround sound. However, as applications that incorporate surround sound technologies become increasingly prevalent, we expect more competitors to enter this field with other solutions. Furthermore, to the extent that competitors’ solutions are perceived, accurately or not, to provide the same advantages as our technologies, at a lower or comparable price, there is a risk that sound encoding technologies such as ours will be treated as commodities, resulting in loss of status of our technologies, decline in their use, and significant pricing pressure. To the extent that our audio technologies become a commodity, rather than a premium solution, our business, operating results, and prospects could be adversely affected.

The loss of or delay in operations of one or more of our key suppliers could materially delay or stop the production of our products and impair our ability to generate revenue.

Our reliance on outside suppliers for some of the key materials and components we use in manufacturing our products involves risks, including limited control over the price, timely delivery, and quality of such components. We have no agreements with our suppliers to ensure continued supply of materials and components. Although we have identified alternate suppliers for most of our key materials and components, any required changes in our suppliers could cause material delays in our production operations and increase our production costs. In addition, at times our suppliers have not been, and in the future may not be, able to meet our production demands as to volume, quality or timeliness. Moreover, we rely on sole source suppliers for some of the components that we use to manufacture our products, including specific charged coupled devices, light emitting diodes, and digital signal processors. These sole source suppliers may become unable or unwilling to deliver these components to us at an acceptable cost or at all, which could force us to redesign those specific products. Our inability to obtain timely delivery of key components of acceptable quality, any significant increases in the prices of components, or the redesign of our products could result in material production delays, increased costs, and reductions in shipments of our products, any of which could increase our operating costs, harm our customer relationships or materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. For example, during the quarter ending March 26, 2010, strong market demand for 3D and digital cinema units, combined with component constraints within the electronics industry and supplier manufacturing capacity constraints limited our ability to ship 3D and digital cinema products and accessories, creating a backlog of orders.

Revenue from our products may suffer if our production processes encounter problems or if we are not able to match our production capacity to fluctuating levels of demand.

Our products are highly complex and production difficulties or inefficiencies can interrupt production, resulting in our inability to deliver products on time in a cost effective manner, which could harm our competitive position. We have a single production facility, and we use contract manufacturers to produce some of our higher volume product lines as needed. Our reliance on contract manufacturers for the manufacture of our higher volume products involves risks, including limited control over timely delivery and quality of such products. If production of our products is interrupted, we may not be able to manufacture products on a timely basis, and customers may purchase products from our competitors. A shortage of manufacturing capacity for our products could adversely affect our operating results and damage our customer relationships. We generally cannot quickly adapt our manufacturing capacity to rapidly changing market conditions and a contract manufacturer may encounter difficulties as well. Likewise, we may be unable to respond to fluctuations in customer demand. At times we underutilize our manufacturing facilities as a result of reduced demand for some of our products. Any inability to respond to fluctuations in customer demand for our products may adversely affect our gross margins.

Our products, from time to time, experience quality problems that can result in decreased sales and higher operating expenses.

Our products are complex and sometimes contain undetected software or hardware errors, particularly when first introduced or when new versions are released. In addition, to the extent that we engage contract manufacturers we do not have as much control over manufacturing which could result in quality problems. Furthermore, our products are sometimes combined with or incorporated into products from other vendors, sometimes making it difficult to identify the source of a problem. These errors could result in a loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products or cause delays in delivering them and meeting customer demands, any of which could reduce our revenue and raise significant customer relations issues. In addition, if our products contain errors we could be required to replace or reengineer them, which would increase our costs. Moreover, if any such errors cause unintended consequences, we could face claims for product liability. Although we generally attempt to contractually limit liability for defective products to the cost of repairing or replacing these products, if these contract provisions are not enforced, or are unenforceable for any reason, or if liabilities arise that are not effectively limited, we could incur substantial costs in defending and settling product liability claims.

Licensee products that incorporate our technologies, from time to time, experience quality problems that could damage our brand, decrease revenue, and increase operating expenses.

Licensee products that incorporate our technologies often are complex and sometimes contain undetected software or hardware errors, particularly when first introduced or when new versions are released. In addition, those products are often combined with, or incorporated into, products from other companies, sometimes making it difficult to identify the source of a problem. Any negative publicity or negative impact relating to these product problems could adversely affect the perception of our brand. In addition, these errors could result in loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of those products or Dolby technologies, or cause delays in delivering them and meeting customer demands, any of which could reduce our revenue and raise significant customer relations issues. Although we generally attempt to contractually limit our liability for our licensees’ defective products, we may elect to help reengineer those products, which could adversely affect our operating results.

A loss of one or more of our key customers or licensees in any of our markets could adversely affect our operating results.

From time to time, one or a small number of our customers or licensees may represent a significant percentage of our products, services or licensing revenue. For example, revenue from our largest customer represented approximately 12% of total revenue for fiscal 2010. Although we have agreements with many of these customers, these agreements typically do not require any minimum purchases or minimum royalty fees and do not prohibit customers from purchasing products and services from competitors. A decision by any of our major customers or licensees not to use our technologies, or their failure or inability to pay amounts owed to us in a timely manner, or at all, whether due to strategic redirections or adverse changes in their businesses or for other reasons, could have a significant adverse effect on our operating results.

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs upon us and may adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Some of our operations use substances regulated under various federal, state, local, and international laws governing the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management, disposal, and labeling of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could incur costs, fines, and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims, or could be required to incur substantial investigation or remediation costs, if we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws. Liability under environmental laws can be joint and several and without regard to comparative fault. The ultimate costs under environmental laws and the timing of these costs are difficult to predict.

We also face increasing complexity in our product design as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the materials composition of our products. For example, we redesigned our products so we could continue to offer them for sale within the European Union, when restrictions on lead and other hazardous substances that apply to specified electronic products put on the market in the European Union became effective in 2006. Similar requirements related to marking of electronic products became effective in China in 2007. For some products, substituting particular components containing regulated hazardous substances is more difficult or costly, and additional redesign efforts could result in production delays. Selected electronic products that we maintain in inventory may be rendered obsolete if not in compliance with the new environmental laws, which could negatively impact our ability to generate revenue from those products.

We also expect that our operations, whether manufacturing or licensing, will be affected by other new environmental laws and regulations on an ongoing basis. Although we cannot predict the ultimate impact of any such new laws and regulations, they will likely result in additional costs or decreased revenue, and could require that we redesign or change how we manufacture our products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Continued global credit market weakness could negatively impact the value and liquidity of our investment portfolio.

We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types, and maturities, including money market funds, U.S. treasury and agency securities, municipal debt securities, corporate bonds, and commercial paper. Although we follow an established investment policy and seek to minimize the credit risk associated with investments, these investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market, and interest rate risks. Any downgrades, losses, failed auctions or other significant deterioration in the fair value of our cash, cash equivalents or investments could negatively impact our investments or our ability to meet our investment objectives. Such negative impact, should it arise, could require an impairment charge, which would adversely impact our financial results.

We maintain sales, marketing, and business operations in foreign countries, most significantly in the United Kingdom. Consequently, we are exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates associated with the local currencies of our foreign business operations. While nearly all of our revenue is derived from transactions denominated in U.S. dollars, nearly all of our costs from our foreign operations are denominated in the currency of that foreign location. Consequently, exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could have a material impact on our profitability.

We rely significantly on a global network of independent, regional distributors to market and distribute our cinema and broadcast products. Our distributor arrangements are non-exclusive and our distributors are not obligated to buy our products and can represent competing products. If we lose a major distributor for any reason or if our distributors are unable or unwilling to dedicate the resources necessary to promote our portfolio of products, our revenue will be adversely affected. Difficulties in ongoing relationships with distributors, such as failures to adhere to our policies also could adversely affect us. For example, while we have implement policies designed to promote compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, export controls, and local laws, we do not have direct control over the business and risk management policies adopted by our distributors, and they could act contrary to our policies.

For the foreseeable future, Ray Dolby or his affiliates will be able to control the selection of all members of our board of directors, as well as virtually every other matter that requires stockholder approval, which will severely limit the ability of other stockholders to influence corporate matters.

At September 24, 2010, Ray Dolby and his affiliates owned 100 shares of our Class A common stock and 58,900,000 shares of our Class B common stock. As of September 24, 2010, Ray Dolby and his affiliates, including his family members, had voting power of approximately 99.5% of our outstanding Class B common stock, which in the aggregate represented approximately 91.3% of the combined voting power of our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. Under our certificate of incorporation, holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share while holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Generally, shares of Class B common stock automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock upon transfer of such Class B common stock, other than transfers to certain specified persons and entities, including the spouse and descendants of Ray Dolby and the spouses and domestic partners of such descendants. Because of this dual class structure, Ray Dolby, his affiliates, and his family members and descendants will, for the foreseeable future, have significant influence over our management and affairs, and will be able to control virtually all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions such as mergers or other sales of our company or assets, even if they come to own considerably less than 50% of the total number of outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock. Ray Dolby, his affiliates, his family members, and descendants will maintain this control even if in the future they come to own considerably less than 50% of the total number of outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock. Moreover, these persons may take actions in their own interests that our stockholders do not view as beneficial. Absent a transfer of Class B common stock that would trigger an automatic conversion as described above, there is no threshold or time deadline at which the shares of Class B common stock will automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock. Assuming conversion of all shares of Class B common stock held by persons not affiliated with Ray Dolby into shares of Class A common stock, so long as Ray Dolby and his affiliates, his family members, and descendants continue to hold shares of Class B common stock representing approximately 10% or more of the total number of outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock, they will hold a majority of the combined voting power of the Class A and Class B common stock.

If our founder, officers, directors or employees sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in the public market, including shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Class B common stock, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline. As of September 24, 2010, we had a total of 112,084,039 shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding. Of these shares, 31,625,000 shares of Class A common stock were sold in our initial public offering by us and the selling stockholders, and an additional 8,000,000 shares of Class A common stock were sold in a secondary offering in May 2007 by our principal stockholder.

As of September 24, 2010, our directors and executive officers beneficially held 58,980,000 shares of Class B common stock, 34,180 shares of Class A common stock, vested options to purchase 250,000 shares of Class B common stock and vested options to purchase 395,767 shares of Class A common stock. We expect that any sale of our Class A common stock by our directors and executive officers would be subject to compliance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

Our principal corporate office, which we lease from Ray Dolby, is located at 100 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California. This office provides approximately 70,000 square feet of space. The lease for this office expires on December 31, 2013, but we have options to renew the lease for two additional five-year terms.

Ray and Dagmar Dolby, the Ray Dolby Trust, or the Dolby Family Trust own a majority financial interest in real estate entities that own and lease to us certain of our other facilities in California and the United Kingdom. We own the remaining financial interests in these real estate entities. We lease from these real estate entities approximately 122,000 square feet of space at 999 Brannan Street, San Francisco, California for our principal administrative offices, approximately 45,000 square feet of space in Brisbane, California for manufacturing facilities and approximately 19,000 square feet of space in Burbank, California for research and development, sales, services and administrative facilities. In addition, we lease from these real estate entities approximately 75,000 square feet of space in Wootton Bassett, England which was used for manufacturing, sales, services and administrative facilities. In fiscal 2009, we consolidated our Wootton Bassett, U.K. manufacturing operations into our Brisbane, California facility to improve efficiencies. We continue to use the Wootton Bassett facilities for sales and services. The leases for these facilities expire at various times through 2015.

We also lease additional research and development, sales, product testing and administrative facilities from third parties in California, New York, Pennsylvania and internationally, including in Asia, Europe, Australia and Canada.

We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet our needs for the near future and that suitable additional or alternative space will be available on commercially reasonable terms to accommodate our foreseeable future operations.

We are involved in various legal proceedings from time to time arising from the normal course of business activities, including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights, commercial, employment and other matters. In our opinion, resolution of these proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. However, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could materially affect our future operating results or financial condition in a particular period.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, under the symbol “DLB.” The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices on the NYSE of the Class A common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the NYSE. Such quotations represent inter dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

As of November 4, 2010, there were approximately 24 holders of record of our Class A common stock and 59 holders of record of our Class B common stock. The number of beneficial stockholders is substantially greater than the number of holders of record because a large portion of our common stock is held through brokerage firms.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividend on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings and do not currently plan to pay any dividends in the immediate future. The payment of future dividends on the common stock and the rate of such dividends, if any, and when not restricted, will be determined by our board of directors in light of our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, and any other relevant factors.

In the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, we issued an aggregate of 125,848 shares of our Class B common stock to certain employees, officers and directors upon the exercise of options awarded under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and since September 25, 2010 through November 4, 2010, we issued an aggregate of 97,950 shares of our Class B common stock to certain employees and officers upon the exercise of options awarded under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. We received aggregate proceeds of approximately $0.2 million in the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, and approximately $0.2 million in the period since September 25, 2010 through November 4, 2010 as a result of the exercise of these options. We believe these transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 701 thereunder as transactions pursuant to compensatory benefit plans and contracts relating to compensation as provided under Rule 701. As of November 4, 2010 options to purchase an aggregate of 634,039 shares of our Class B common stock remain outstanding. All issuances of shares of our Class B common stock pursuant to the exercise of these options will be made in reliance on Rule 701. All option grants made under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan were made prior to the effectiveness of our initial public offering. No further option grants will be made under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

None of the foregoing transactions involved any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering.

Each share of our Class B common stock is convertible into one share of our Class A common stock at any time at the option of the holder or upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B common stock. In addition, each share of Class B common stock shall convert automatically into one share of Class A common stock upon any transfer, except for certain transfers described in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

The following table provides information regarding the Company's purchases of its Class A Common stock, $0.001 par value per share, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010:

The following graph compares the total return of our Class A common stock with the total return for the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index (the “NYSE Composite”) and the Russell 3000 Index (the “Russell 3000”) for the five fiscal years ending September 24, 2010. The figures represented below assume an investment of $100 in our Class A common stock at the closing price of $16.00 on September 30, 2005, and in the NYSE Composite and the Russell 3000 on the same date and the reinvestment of dividends into shares of common stock. The comparisons in the table are required by the SEC and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our Class A common stock. This graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Information used in the graph was obtained from a third party investment research firm, a source believed to be reliable, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in such information.

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this filing. The consolidated statements of operations and balance sheet data, for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2006, September 28, 2007, September 26, 2008, September 25, 2009 and September 24, 2010, were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of financial results to be achieved in future periods. All fiscal years presented consisted of 52 weeks.

ITEM 7—MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis and our discussion under Item 1 “Business” above should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Form 10-K. These discussions contain forward-looking statements reflecting our current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” ”potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: statements regarding the extent and timing of future licensing, products and services revenue levels and mix, expenses, margins, net income per diluted share, income taxes, tax benefits, acquisition costs and related amortization, and other measures of results of operations; our expectations regarding demand and acceptance for our technologies; growth opportunities and trends in the market in which we operate; our plans, strategies and expected opportunities; the deployment of and demand for our products and products incorporating our technologies; and future competition. Actual results may differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including the risks set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere in this filing. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these forward-looking statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to conform our prior statements to actual results.

Our audio technologies are used throughout the global entertainment industry to deliver a premium audio experience to consumers. Use of our technologies in each step of the entertainment creation, distribution, and playback process enables the creator, the producer, and the distributor to develop and present their content to consumers in the manner they intended.

There are a number of current industry trends that provide us with opportunities for future growth, such as the transition to digital television from analog television and the delivery of media content online and via mobile devices. These trends present us with an opportunity to extend the adoption of our technologies to new devices, as the methods by which content can be delivered and the number of devices capable of playing back the content increase.

We view the video and voice markets as early-stage opportunities for us. We believe that our well-recognized brand, our existing customer relationships, and our history of introducing successful innovative technologies are important strengths that will help us pursue these opportunities.

Dolby Laboratories is a global organization that generates revenue by licensing technologies to manufacturers of CE products and to software vendors and by selling products and related services to entertainment content creators and to distributors. We work with the global entertainment industry in three principal ways:

We have licensed our technologies to CE manufacturers and to software vendors in 40 countries and our licensees distribute their products incorporating our technologies throughout the world. We sell our products and provide services in over 85 countries. In fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, revenue from outside of the United States was 66%, 65%, and 66% of our total revenue, respectively. Geographical data for our licensing revenue is based on the location of our licensees’ headquarters. Products revenue is based on the end location where we ship our products, while services revenue is based on the location where services are performed.

We provide products and services to creators and to distributors of audio content that enable them to encode content using our technologies. Such customers include studios, television broadcasters, cable television operators, satellite television operators, and increasingly, downloadable content service providers. We then license our technologies, such as Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, and Dolby Pulse, to CE manufacturers and to software providers which enable CE products to decode and play back audio content previously encoded using the same technologies. Today, our technologies are standard in a wide range of consumer entertainment devices, including virtually all DVD players, audio/video receivers, and personal computer (PC) software DVD players. In addition, the majority of cinemas around the world use our products to play back audio content.

Our revenue increased 28% in fiscal 2010 when compared to fiscal 2009 and we are optimistic about the prospects for our business. However, our business could be affected by adverse changes in general economic conditions because our technologies are incorporated in entertainment-oriented products, which are generally discretionary goods, such as PCs, digital televisions, set-top boxes, DVD players and recorders, Blu-ray Disc players, video game consoles, audio/video receivers, mobile devices, in-car entertainment systems, home-theater-in-a-box systems, camcorders, and portable media devices. Deterioration or continued weakness in economic conditions could suppress consumer demand and harm our business in the markets in which we license our technologies and sell our products.

Licensing revenue constitutes the majority of our total revenue, representing 84%, 83%, and 77% of total revenue in fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. In fiscal 2010, the decrease in our licensing revenue as a percentage of total revenue was due to a greater increase in the growth of our products revenue relative to the growth of our licensing revenue. We categorize our licensing revenue into the following markets (items listed in each market incorporate our technologies):

Our PC market represented approximately 40%, 35%, and 36% of our licensing revenue in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Revenue from our PC market was driven primarily by the inclusion of our technologies in media applications or operating systems often included in PC shipments. These media applications and operating systems include DVD playback and/or DVD authoring functionality that use our technologies. Our PC market also includes revenue from our PC Entertainment Experience (PCEE) program, a suite of technologies that enhances the audio quality of media on entertainment-oriented PCs.

Windows 7, Microsoft’s newest operating system, incorporates Dolby technologies, including Dolby Digital Plus, in four of the six available editions: Home Premium, Ultimate, Professional, and Enterprise. Prior to the release of Windows 7, our technologies were only included in premium consumer editions of Microsoft operating systems. Almost half of the world's PC shipments are to the business market. The inclusion of our technologies in the Professional and Enterprise editions of Windows 7, which are typically purchased by the business market, increases the potential for us to receive royalties on a greater percentage of PC shipments.

There are several uncertainties associated with the Windows 7 opportunity, including the following:

Our broadcast market, driven by demand for our technologies in televisions and set-top boxes, represented approximately 20%, 25%, and 27% of our licensing revenue in fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. Our broadcast market has benefited from increased global shipments of digital televisions containing our technologies in fiscal 2010. We view the broadcast market as an area for continued growth, primarily driven by broadcast markets outside of the United States. We also view broadcast services, such as terrestrial broadcast or IPTV services, which operate under particular bandwidth constraints, as another area of opportunity for us to offer Dolby Digital Plus, HE AAC, and Dolby Pulse, which enable the delivery of high-quality audio content at reduced bit rates, thereby conserving bandwidth. Notwithstanding our success in the broadcast market to date, we may not be able to capitalize on these opportunities and actual results may differ from our expectations.

Our CE market, which was driven primarily by revenue attributable to sales of DVD players and recorders and Blu-ray Disc players, represented approximately 25%, 25%, and 22% of licensing revenue in fiscal 2008,

2009, and 2010, respectively. Within our CE market in fiscal 2010, we experienced an increase in revenue from Blu-ray Disc players when compared to fiscal 2009 partially offset by decreases in revenue from camcorders that incorporate our technologies and from DVD players. In fiscal 2009, we had an increase in revenue from reported shipments of camcorders with our technologies that pertained to prior period sales. Blu-ray Disc continues to represent a revenue growth opportunity within our CE market, as Blu-ray Disc players are required to support Dolby Digital for primary audio content and Dolby Digital Plus for secondary audio content, and Dolby TrueHD is an optional audio standard. However, there is a risk that revenue growth from Blu-ray Disc players may not offset future declines in revenue from DVD players.

Revenue generated from our other markets was driven by gaming, mobile, licensing services, and automotive. Gaming and automotive revenue was primarily driven by sales of video game consoles, portable gaming devices, and in-car entertainment systems with Dolby Digital, ATRAC, Dolby TrueHD, and Dolby Digital Plus technologies. Mobile revenue was primarily driven by demand for the AAC, HE AAC, and Dolby Pulse audio compression technologies incorporated into mobile devices and to a lesser extent by Dolby Mobile, our suite of post processing technologies optimized for mobile devices. We view the mobile market as an area of opportunity to increase revenue, however actual results may differ from our expectations. Revenue from licensing services was primarily driven by demand for standards-based audio compression technologies used in broadcast, PCs, CE and mobile devices.

We have introduced new products and technologies that may allow further expansion of our broadcast and gaming markets, including our Professional Reference Monitor product, Dolby Volume, and Dolby Axon. Our Professional Reference Monitor is a flat-panel video reference display for video professionals so they can complete color critical tasks, such as calibrating color accuracy to professional reference standards. Our Professional Reference Monitor uses our dynamic range imaging technologies, which enable enhanced contrast, extended brightness and dynamic range, along with reduced power consumption in LED backlit LCD televisions. Dolby Volume is a sound leveling technology providing consistent volume and quality across various programs by performing measurement and analysis of signals according to a model based on the characteristics of human hearing. Dolby Axon is a voice technology that delivers surround sound and enables online gamers to perceive the spatial location of other players, thus making the online gaming experience real and immersive. We do not anticipate generating significant revenue from these products and technologies in fiscal 2011.

Digital entertainment products throughout the world incorporate our technologies. We expect that sales of products incorporating our technologies in emerging economies, such as Brazil, China, India, and Russia, will increase as consumers in these markets have more disposable income to purchase entertainment products, although there can be no assurance that this will occur. We also expect that manufacturers from lower cost manufacturing countries, including China, will increase production of digital entertainment products in the future to satisfy this increased demand. There are risks associated with the opportunities of doing business in emerging economies that have affected, and will continue to affect, our operating results, such as manufacturers failing to report or underreporting product shipments containing our technologies.

Products revenue consists primarily of sales of equipment to cinema operators and broadcasters representing 11%, 13%, and 20% of our total revenue in fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively.

Our cinema products represented approximately 68%, 82%, and 90% of total products revenue in fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. This increase in cinema products revenue as a percentage of total revenue and total product revenue in fiscal 2010 was primarily due to increased unit sales of 3D and digital cinema products, coupled with a change in revenue recognition accounting standards. See Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional details about the changes in revenue recognition accounting standards.

There is a trend in the cinema industry to transition to digital cinema. Digital cinema offers the cinema industry a possible means to achieve cost savings in printing and distributing movies, to combat piracy,

and to enable repeated movie playback without degradation in image and audio quality. We offer our Dolby Digital Cinema server, which allows for the storage and playback of digital content. We expect most exhibitors, which are either constructing new theaters or upgrading existing theaters, to choose digital cinema over traditional film cinema.

Our digital 3D products provide 3D image capabilities when combined with a digital cinema projector and server. We believe the success of certain recent 3D cinema releases is leading to the creation and distribution of cinema content. We expect an increase in these releases to further drive the transition to 3D enabled screens because these screens will be needed to accommodate the increasing number of 3D motion pictures. We have shipped over 5,600 3D cinema units to equip screens around the world. We view the transition to 3D enabled screens as a growth opportunity; however, actual results may differ from our expectations.

Digital cinema is based on open standards, which, unlike traditional cinema standards, do not include our proprietary audio technologies. We are facing more pricing and other competitive pressures in the digital cinema products market than we have historically experienced in our traditional cinema market.

Several competitors have introduced digital cinema products that support the presentation of movies with higher resolution “4K” digital cinema projectors. Certain major U.S. exhibitors have begun installing 4K digital cinema equipment into their theaters. In the future, other exhibitors may feel that they need to outfit some or all of their theaters with 4K digital cinema equipment to compete in the same markets where competitors are promoting 4K products. Dolby currently does not offer a 4K digital cinema product. If we do not offer a product that supports 4K presentation, our future prospects in digital cinema may be limited and our business could be adversely affected.

Our traditional cinema products are primarily used to read and decode a film’s soundtrack, to calibrate cinema sound systems, and to adapt analog cinema audio systems to digital audio formats. In fiscal 2010, as the cinema industry transitions to digital cinema, revenue from our traditional cinema products has declined as a percentage of total cinema products revenue due to increases in 3D digital cinema revenue. We expect this decline to continue.

Our broadcast products represented approximately 24%, 13%, and 9% of products revenue in fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. Our broadcast products are used to encode, transmit, and decode multiple channels of high-quality audio content for DTV and HDTV program production and broadcast distribution and to measure the subjective loudness of audio content within broadcast programming. The decrease in broadcast product revenue as a percentage of total product revenue in fiscal 2010 was primarily due to the increase in 3D and digital cinema product revenue noted above.

Our services revenue, which represented approximately 5%, 4%, and 3% of total revenue in fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively, is primarily tied to the cinema industry and, in particular, to the number of films being made by studios and independent filmmakers. Several factors influence the number of films produced in a given fiscal period, including strikes and work stoppages within the cinema industry as well as tax incentive arrangements that many governments provide filmmakers to promote local filmmaking.

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., or U.S. GAAP, and pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations. U.S. GAAP and SEC rules and regulations require us to use accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingencies as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during a fiscal period. The SEC considers an accounting policy and estimate to be critical if it is both important to a

company’s financial condition and/or results of operations and if it requires significant judgment on the part of management in its application. On a regular basis, we evaluate our assumptions, judgment, and estimates. We have discussed the selection and development of the critical accounting policies and estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors. The audit committee has reviewed our related disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Although we believe that our judgments and estimates are appropriate and correct, actual results may differ from these estimates.

We consider the following to be critical accounting policies and estimates because we believe they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and they require management judgments about matters that are uncertain. If actual results or events differ materially, our reported financial condition and results of operation for future periods could be materially affected. See our “Risk Factors” for further information on the potential risks to our future results of operations.

We enter into revenue arrangements with our customers to license technologies, trademarks, and know-how and to sell products and services. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. Judgment is required to assess whether collectibility is probable. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of our customer’s recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter of credit between the customer’s financial institution and our financial institution, and other factors.

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the revenue recognition accounting standards to exclude sales of qualifying tangible products that contain essential software elements from the scope of the software revenue recognition standards. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we adopted this accounting standard for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after September 25, 2009. Due to this adoption, we no longer account for product sales that contain software elements under the software revenue recognition standards.

Also in October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting standards for multiple-element (ME) revenue arrangements to:

In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we adopted the amended accounting standards for ME revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after September 25, 2009. Prior to adoption, we were not able to establish VSOE of the standalone selling price for the undelivered support and maintenance elements for a majority of our ME arrangements. The previous accounting standards required VSOE in order to allocate the arrangement fees to each undelivered element. Since we had not established VSOE, we allocated the arrangement fees to the undelivered element and ratably recognized the revenue over its estimated support period.

available. In the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, we established VSOE for a majority of the undelivered elements in our ME arrangements. For these arrangements, the VSOE and the ESP value are essentially the same. For arrangements where VSOE does not exist, we use ESP.

We determine our best estimate of the selling price for an individual element within a ME revenue arrangement using the same methods utilized to determine the selling price of an element sold on a standalone basis. If we sell the element on a standalone basis, we estimate the selling price by considering actual sales prices. Otherwise, we estimate the selling price by considering internal factors such as pricing practices and margin objectives. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies, customer demands, and industry technology lifecycles. Management applies judgment to establish margin objectives, pricing strategies, and technology lifecycles.

We evaluate each element in a ME arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value and delivery of an undelivered element is probable and within our control. When these criteria are not met, the delivered and undelivered elements are combined and the arrangement fees are allocated to this combined single unit. Our adoption of the amended guidance changed our units of accounting for our revenue transactions by allowing us to use VSOE or ESP to allocate the total fees amongst the delivered and undelivered elements in an arrangement.

If the unit separation criteria are met, we account for each element within a ME arrangement (such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services) separately and we allocate fees from the arrangement based on the relative selling price of each element. For some arrangements, customers receive certain elements over a period after delivery of the initial product. These elements may include support and maintenance and/or the right to receive upgrades. Revenue allocated to the undelivered element is recognized over either its estimated service period or when the upgrade is delivered. We do not recognize revenue that is contingent upon the future delivery of products or services or upon future performance obligations. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when we have completed all contractual obligations.

We account for the majority of our digital cinema server sales as ME arrangements that have two separate units, or elements, of accounting. The first element consists of our digital cinema server hardware and the accompanying software, which is essential to the functionality of the hardware. This element is typically delivered at the time of sale. The second element is the right to receive support and maintenance, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered over a service period subsequent to the initial sale. The application of the new revenue accounting standards to our digital cinema server sales typically results in the allocation of a substantial majority of the arrangement fees to the delivered hardware element based on its ESP, which we recognize as revenue at the time of sale. A small portion of the arrangement fees are allocated to the undelivered support and maintenance element, based on its VSOE or ESP, and is recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated service period.

We evaluate and test our goodwill for impairment at a reporting-unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below. Our operating segments are aligned with the management principles of our business. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. In the first step, we compare the carrying value of the net assets of a reporting unit, including goodwill, to its fair value. If we determine that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we move to the second step to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, we would record an impairment loss equal to the difference. We test goodwill for impairment annually during our third fiscal quarter and if an event occurs or circumstances change such that there is an indication of a reduction in the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.

We use the income approach to determine the fair value of our reporting units, which is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows for each reporting unit. Fair value reflects the price a market participant would be willing to pay in a potential sale of the reporting unit. During our annual goodwill impairment test, we had two reporting units—Via, which has no assigned goodwill, and Dolby Entertainment Technology (DET), with goodwill of $258.9 million. The cash flow model was based on our best estimate of future revenue and operating costs. We estimated our future revenue by applying growth rates, consistent with those used in our internal forecasts, to our current revenue forecasts. The revenue and cost estimates were based on several sources including our historical information, third-party industry data, and review of our internal operations. The cash flow forecasts were adjusted by a discount rate of approximately 13% based on our weighted average cost of capital derived by using the capital asset pricing model. The primary components of this model include weighting our total asset structure between our equity and debt, the risk-free rate of return on U.S. Treasury bonds, market risk premium based on a range of historical returns and forward-looking estimates, and the beta of our common stock. Our model utilized an effective tax rate of approximately 35%.

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Our intangible assets principally consist of acquired technology, patents, trademarks, customer relationships, and contracts, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives ranging from two to fifteen years.

We review long-lived assets, including intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or a change in circumstances indicate an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to the total future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If it is determined that an asset is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value.

We make estimates and judgments that affect our accounting for income taxes. This includes estimating actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences, including the timing of the recognition of stock-based compensation expense, result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheets. We also assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance.

Our policy is to recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position is sustainable upon examination by tax authorities. We include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within our provision for income taxes. When accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued are reduced in the period and are reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.

Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, the deferred tax asset and liability balances, the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, and the reserve resulting from uncertainties in income tax positions. Our financial position and results of operations may be materially affected if actual results differ significantly from these estimates or if the estimates are adjusted in future periods.

We determine the expense for all employee stock-based compensation awards by estimating their fair value and by recognizing that value as an expense, on a ratable basis, in the consolidated financial statements over the requisite service period in which our employees earn the awards. We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of employee stock options at the date of the grant. To determine the fair value of a stock-based award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model we make assumptions regarding the expected term of the award, the expected future volatility of our stock price over the expected term of the award, and the risk-free interest rate over the expected term of the award. We estimate the expected term of our stock-

based awards by evaluating historical exercise patterns of our employees. We utilize a blend of the historical volatility of our common stock and the implied volatility of our traded options as an estimate of the expected volatility of our stock price over the expected term of the awards. We use an average interest rate based on U.S. Treasury instruments with terms consistent with the expected term of our awards to estimate the risk-free interest rate. We reduce the stock-based compensation expense for estimated forfeitures based on our historical experience. We are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of the grant and revise our estimate, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from our estimate.

Licensing. The 19% increase in licensing revenue from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was primarily driven by an increase in revenue from our broadcast and PC markets, and to a lesser extent, by increases in revenue from our CE and other markets. The increase in revenue from our broadcast market was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of digital televisions that incorporate our technologies sold in Europe and APAC in fiscal 2010 when compared to fiscal 2009. The increase in revenue from our PC market was primarily driven by a greater number of computers sold containing Windows operating systems that incorporate our technologies in fiscal 2010 when compared to fiscal 2009. The increase in revenue from our CE market was primarily driven by an increase in revenue from Blu-ray Disc players incorporating our technologies in fiscal 2010, partially offset by a decrease in revenue attributable to camcorders, and to a lesser extent, DVD players that incorporate our technologies. In fiscal 2009, we had an increase in revenue from reported shipments of camcorders incorporating our technologies that pertained to prior period sales. The increase in revenue from our other markets was primarily due to an increase in HE AAC related revenue in the mobile market.

The 11% increase in licensing revenue from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was driven by increased revenue from our broadcast and mobile markets. The increase in revenue from our broadcast market was primarily driven by shipments in the U.S. of set-top boxes, including NTIA converter boxes and DTA devices, which contain our technologies and an increase in the number of digital televisions sold in Europe and APAC that incorporate our technologies when compared to the prior year. The increase in revenue from our mobile market was primarily driven by the adoption of HE AAC technology, which was incorporated into a greater number of mobile devices sold in the current year than in the prior year.

Products. The 88% increase in products revenue from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was due to increases in 3D and digital cinema units sold, coupled with our adoption of new revenue recognition accounting standards in the beginning of fiscal 2010. We sold a greater number of 3D and digital cinema units in fiscal 2010 when compared to fiscal 2009 due to strong market demand driven by the success of certain recent 3D cinema releases and promotions that offered certain price discounts for various bundled sets of digital cinema units, 3D units, and 3D glasses in fiscal 2010. In addition, the new revenue recognition accounting standards allow us to recognize substantially all of the revenue associated with our digital cinema products sold in the period of sale. See Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional details.

The 33% increase in product sales from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was primarily driven by the recognition of approximately $38.6 million of digital cinema product revenue, including $25.1 million relating to products sold in years prior to fiscal 2009, as a result of achieving compliance with the Digital Cinema Initiative (“DCI”) specifications and satisfying all other revenue recognition criteria. These increases in digital cinema related product revenue were partially offset by a decrease in sales of our traditional cinema products.

Services. The 10% increase in services revenue from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was primarily attributable to an increase in film services, particularly mastering services on digital films, and distribution activities. In addition, fiscal 2009 included $1.8 million of costs incurred under a promotional arrangement with a customer. This amount was charged against services revenue with no corresponding charge to cost of services.

The 6% decrease in services revenue from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was primarily driven by a $1.8 million charge to services revenue as a result of costs incurred under the above-described promotional arrangement with a customer in fiscal 2009. Excluding this item, services revenue from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was largely unchanged.

Licensing Gross Margin. We license intellectual property to our customers that may be internally developed, acquired by us, or licensed from third parties. Our cost of licensing consists principally of amortization expenses associated with purchased intangible assets and intangible assets acquired in business combinations. Our cost of licensing also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then sublicense to our customers.

Licensing gross margin decreased three points from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010, due primarily to a gain from an amended patent licensing agreement that we recorded within cost of revenue in our consolidated statement of operations in fiscal 2009. Excluding the gain from the amended patent licensing agreement, our licensing gross margin was unchanged from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010.

Licensing gross margin increased four points from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009, due primarily to the above-described gain from an amended patent licensing agreement. The gain from the amended patent licensing agreement was recorded within cost of revenue in our consolidated statement of operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

Products Gross Margin. Cost of products primarily consists of the cost of materials related to products sold, applied labor and manufacturing overhead. Our cost of products also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then include in our products. Products gross margin increased 10 points from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 due to a greater proportion of higher margin 3D and digital cinema products sold in fiscal 2010. These products carried a higher gross margin in fiscal 2010 due, in part, to cost reductions and to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in fiscal 2009. The increase in gross margins was also due to the recognition of significant amounts of low margin digital cinema-related products revenue and related costs as a result of achieving compliance with the DCI specifications in fiscal 2009.

Product sales gross margin decreased by five points from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009, due to the recognition of revenue and associated costs related to previously deferred digital cinema related equipment sales which had significantly lower margins than our traditional cinema and broadcast products. Prior to the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we had not recognized revenue related to sales of our digital cinema related products as we had not yet achieved compliance with the DCI specifications. In the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we achieved compliance with the DCI specifications and therefore began recognizing this revenue and related costs. The total amount of products revenue which we recognized in fiscal 2009 as a result of achieving compliance with the DCI specifications was $38.6 million, including $25.1 million relating to products sold in years prior to fiscal 2009. The product margins related to the digital cinema related equipment revenue recognized in fiscal 2009 were particularly low due to a combination of factors that are common with new product launches, including higher initial per unit costs resulting from low manufacturing volumes. Additionally, field upgrade costs were incurred after the initial shipment of the products to the end users to ensure our products complied with our contractual obligations. As a result of these factors, product sales gross margin in fiscal 2009 was significantly lower than our product sales gross margin in the prior year.

Services Gross Margin. Cost of services primarily consists of payroll and benefits costs for employees performing our professional services, the cost of outside consultants, and reimbursable expenses incurred on behalf of customers. Services gross margin was unchanged from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 despite a $1.8 million reduction to services revenue, related to an arrangement with a customer in fiscal 2009, due to increases in personnel related expenses and performance based compensation in fiscal 2010.

Services gross margin decreased three points from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 primarily driven by a $1.8 million reduction to services revenue related to an arrangement with a customer in fiscal 2009, with no corresponding credit to cost of services.

Impairment of Products Provided Under Operating Leases. Our products provided under operating leases represent digital cinema equipment that we leased to exhibitors beginning in fiscal 2005 in an effort to encourage the cinema industry to transition to digital cinema. We receive a virtual print fee from participating film studios for each digital print delivered for exhibition on this equipment. Based on our estimates of future cash flows from virtual print fees and the potential sale value of this equipment, we determined that the equipment was impaired in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Accordingly, we recorded the $9.6 million excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair market value of the equipment as an impairment charge. We believe that the remaining carrying value of our products provided under operating leases is recoverable as of September 24, 2010. We have historically recorded the depreciation of our products provided under operating leases to cost of services.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel and personnel-related costs, facility costs, and project development costs related to new technologies and products. The 29% increase in research and development expenses from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was primarily driven by an increase in personnel expenses related to increases in headcount, performance-based compensation, facility costs and prototype expenses related to the development of new products.

The 5% increase in research and development expense from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was primarily driven by an increase in personnel expenses due to increases in headcount and temporary consulting expenses resulting from an increase in research and development projects, partially offset by a decrease in performance-based compensation.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel and personnel-related expenses, facility costs, advertising and promotion expenses, travel-related expenses for our sales and marketing functions, cost of outside consultants and tradeshow expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased 32% from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010. This increase was due to increases in performance-based compensation, advertising expenses, increases in headcount, and travel-related expenses. Additionally, sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2009 and 2010 were offset by $6.0 million and $7.8 million, respectively, in gains on settlements, which are reductions to operating expenses due to payments received from the resolution of disputes with implementation licensees from which we typically do not earn royalties.

The 11% decrease in sales and marketing expenses from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was primarily due to gains on settlements of $6.0 million in FY 2009, compared to only $0.5 million in FY 2008. The decreases were further driven by a decrease in performance-based compensation, travel-related expenses, and advertising expenses.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and personnel-related expenses, professional fees, facility costs, depreciation of fixed assets, and cost of outside consultants. The 13% increase in general and administrative expenses from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was primarily due to increases in performance-based compensation, software and depreciation expense related to the reorganization of our global business operations and professional fees.

The 8% increase in general and administrative expenses from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was primarily driven by increase in personnel expenses due to an increase in headcount.

Restructuring Charges, net. Restructuring for fiscal 2010 primarily includes severance charges attributable to the reorganization of our global business operations and an impairment charge related to the decision to sell one of our buildings in the U.K. See Note 6 “Restructuring” for additional details.

Restructuring charges for fiscal 2009 include severance and other charges attributable to the consolidation of our Wootton Bassett, U.K. manufacturing operations into our Brisbane, California facility. In fiscal 2009, we recorded charges of $3.8 million related to the consolidation of our manufacturing operations.

Restructuring charges for fiscal 2009 also include severance and other charges of $1.0 million resulting from integrating our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cinea, into our Dolby Entertainment Technology reporting unit. These charges were attributable to the termination of employees and to ceasing use of two leased facilities.

Other income, net, primarily consists of interest income earned on cash, cash equivalents, and investments, offset by interest expense principally attributable to debt balances on certain of our facilities. All facility related debt was fully paid off in fiscal 2010. Also included are net gains/losses from foreign currency transactions, net gains from sales of available-for-sale securities, net gains/losses from trading securities, offset by net gains/losses from derivative instruments.

The increase in other income, net from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was primarily due to net gains of $1.4 million related to redemptions at par of auction rate certificates, and the extinguishment of the associated UBS Put Rights in 2010. This compares to a net loss of approximately $1.4 million related to our auction rate certificates and associated Put Rights in fiscal 2009. These gains were partially offset by lower interest income due to lower prevailing interest rates for our cash, cash equivalents, and investments balances, and losses from foreign currency transactions primarily due to the change in the value of the Euro and British Pound Sterling relative to the U.S. Dollar. See Note 3 “Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions” for additional details regarding these Put Rights.

The decrease in other income, net from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was primarily due to lower prevailing interest rates, resulting in a lower return on our investments. This was partially offset by higher interest bearing cash, cash equivalent and investment balances.

Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 was 35% compared to 34% in fiscal 2009. In fiscal 2009, a change in tax law reinstated federal research and development tax credits for fiscal 2009 and for periods prior to fiscal 2009. As a result, we recognized an increase in federal research and development tax credits in fiscal 2009, thereby lowering our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 does not include a full-year benefit from federal research and development tax credits due to the expiration of these credits on December 31, 2009. Additionally, a reduction in tax exempt interest income further increased the 2010 tax rate.

Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was 34% compared to 33% in fiscal 2008. The increase in our effective tax rate was primarily due to decreased tax exempt interest income and benefits attributable to manufacturing incentive tax deductions as compared to fiscal 2008. The increase in our effective tax rate was partially offset by a benefit recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 attributable to the reinstatement of the federal research and development credit.

Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents, and investments, as well as cash flows from our operations. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents, and potential cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our currently anticipated cash requirements through at least the next 12 months.

Cash flow from operating activities for fiscal 2010 was primarily driven by net income of $282.8 million. Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2010 was primarily driven by capital expenditures of $37.5 million for fiscal 2010. Cash used in financing activities for fiscal 2010 was primarily driven by our stock repurchase program of $241.4 million.

Our liquidity is not dependent on the use of off-balance sheet financing arrangements other than our operating leases.

The following table presents a summary of our contractual obligations and commitments as of September 24, 2010.

As of September 24, 2010, we had an accrued liability for unrecognized tax benefits, related interest and penalties, net of related deferred tax assets, totaling $13.8 million. We are unable to estimate when any cash settlement with a taxing authority might occur.

Other Possible Cash Obligations. Under the terms of the agreement to acquire all outstanding shares of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cinea, in September 2003, we have future payment obligations that equal approximately 5% to 8% of the revenue generated from products incorporating certain technologies we acquired in the transaction through 2022. As of September 24, 2010, no additional purchase consideration had been paid and no liability is reflected on our balance sheet. We currently have not met, and we do not expect to meet in the future, the revenue threshold that would trigger a payment obligation.

As of September 24, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $545.9 million, which consisted of cash and highly-liquid money market funds. In addition, we had short-term and long-term investments of $493.1 million, which consisted primarily of municipal debt securities, U.S. agency securities, and U.S. government bonds. These investments are subject to fluctuations in interest rates, which could impact our results. At September 24, 2010, the weighted-average effective maturity of our investment portfolio was less than one year. Based on our investment portfolio balance as of September 24, 2010, a hypothetical change in interest rates of 1% would have approximately a $4.0 million impact, and a change of 0.5% would have approximately a $2.0 million impact on the carrying value of our portfolio. Furthermore, a hypothetical change in interest rates of 1% would have approximately a $6.8 million impact and a change of 0.5% would have approximately a $3.4 million impact on interest income over a one-year period.

We do not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, nor do we utilize leveraged financial instruments.

We maintain sales, marketing, and business operations in foreign countries, most significantly in the United Kingdom. We also conduct a growing portion of our business outside of the United States through subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar (primarily Euros, British Pounds, and Australian Dollars). As a result, we face exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the financial results of our international operations are translated from local currency into U.S. dollars upon consolidation. Most of our revenue from international markets is denominated in U.S. dollars, while the operating expenses of our international subsidiaries are predominantly denominated in local currency. Therefore, if the U.S. dollar weakens against the local currency, we will have increased operating expenses, which will only be partially offset by net revenue. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar strengthens against the local currency, operating expenses will decrease, which will only be partially offset by net revenue. Additionally, foreign exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency result in gains or losses that are reflected in our consolidated statement of operations. Our international operations are subject to risks typical of international business, including, but not limited to, differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 24, 2010 and September 25, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 24, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 24, 2010 and September 25, 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 24, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes at the beginning of fiscal year 2008, and changed its method of accounting for multiple-element revenue arrangements at the beginning of fiscal 2010.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Dolby Laboratories, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 24, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated November 18, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

We have audited Dolby Laboratories, Inc.’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of September 24, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 24, 2010 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 24, 2010 and September 25, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 24, 2010, and our report dated November 18, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dolby Laboratories and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. In addition, we have consolidated the financial results of jointly-owned affiliated companies in which our principal stockholder has a controlling interest. We report these controlling interests as a separate line in our consolidated statements of operations as net (income) / loss attributable to controlling interest and in our consolidated balance sheets as controlling interest. We eliminate all intercompany accounts and transactions upon consolidation.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include estimated selling prices for elements sold in multiple-element revenue arrangements, valuation allowances for accounts receivable, carrying values of inventories, products provided under operating leases, goodwill, intangible assets, stock-based compensation, fair values of investments, put rights, accrued expenses, including liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits and deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

We have changed the presentation of our operating expenses categories from prior years. To provide additional detail, we have separated the selling, general, and administrative category presented in prior years into two categories: sales and marketing and general and administrative. We have also reclassified certain prior period amounts within our consolidated statements of operations to conform to current period presentation. Prior year research and development-related facilities and other expenses that were previously presented within the selling, general, and administrative category of operating expenses were reclassified to the research and development category of operating expenses. In addition, we reclassified gain on settlements, which was presented in prior years as a separate category within operating expenses, into the sales and marketing category of operating expenses.

Our fiscal year is a 52 or 53 week period ending on the last Friday in September. The fiscal years presented herein include 52 week periods ended September 26, 2008 (fiscal 2008), September 25, 2009 (fiscal 2009) and September 24, 2010 (fiscal 2010). Our fiscal year ending September 30, 2011 (fiscal 2011) will consist of 53 weeks.

Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash, cash equivalents, investments and accounts receivable. We deposit our cash, cash equivalents and investments in accounts with major financial institutions and such investments may be in excess of federal insured limits. Our products are sold to businesses primarily in the Americas and Europe, and the majority of our licensing revenue is generated from customers outside of the United States. We manage this risk by evaluating in advance the financial condition and creditworthiness of our product and services customers and perform regular evaluations

of the creditworthiness of our licensing customers. In fiscal 2008 and 2009, one customer accounted for approximately 10% of our total revenue and in fiscal 2010 the same customer accounted for 12% of total revenue.

We consider all short-term highly liquid investments that have original maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of funds held in general checking accounts, money market accounts, municipal debt securities, U.S. agency notes, and commercial papers.

All of our investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, with the exception of our auction rate certificates and investments held in our supplemental retirement plan, which are classified as trading. Investments that have original maturities of 91 days or more at the date of purchase and with a current maturity of less than one year are classified as short-term investments and investments that have maturities of more than one year are classified as long-term investments. Our investments are recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet. Unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income while realized gains and losses, other-than-temporary impairments and credit losses are reported as a component of net income.

We evaluate our investment portfolio for credit losses and other-than-temporary impairments by comparing the fair value with the cost basis for each of our investment securities. An investment is impaired if the fair value is less than its cost basis. If any portion of the impairment is deemed to be the result of a credit loss, the credit loss portion of the impairment is included as a component of net income. If we deem it probable that we will not recover the full cost basis of the security, the security is other-than-temporarily impaired and the impairment loss is recognized as a component of net income.

During the fiscal year-to-date period ended June 25, 2010, we redeemed $41.7 million in par value of auction rate securities. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we exercised our Put Rights, resulting in the redemption at par of the remaining $26.4 million in par value of auction rate securities. See Note 3 “Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions” for further discussion.

We continually monitor customer payments and maintain a reserve for estimated losses resulting from our customers’ inability to make required payments. In determining the reserve, we evaluate the collectability of our accounts receivable based upon a variety of factors. In cases where we are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations, we record a specific allowance against amounts due, and thereby reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably believed to be collectible. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on our actual historical write-off experience in conjunction with the length of time the receivables are past due, customer creditworthiness, geographic risk and the current business environment. Actual future losses from uncollectible accounts may differ from our estimates.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market (net realizable value). We evaluate our ending inventories for estimated excess quantities and obsolescence. Our evaluation includes the analysis of future sales demand by product within specific time horizons. Inventories in excess of projected future demand are written down to net realizable value. In addition, we assess the impact of changing technology on our inventory balances and write-off inventories that are considered obsolete. Write downs of inventory are recorded as a cost of products.

Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method based on estimated useful lives as follows:

From time to time, we review our estimates of useful lives for the various categories of property, plant and equipment. During the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, we completed an assessment of the useful lives of computer equipment. Previously, we estimated the useful lives of computer equipment to be four years. However, based on actual and intended usage of these assets, we have changed the estimate of useful lives of computer equipment to three years, which we believe better approximates the useful life of the assets.

We account for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use by capitalizing costs of materials, consultants, payroll and payroll-related costs incurred in developing internal use computer software. These costs are included in property, plant, and equipment, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages are charged to expense. Our capitalized internal use software costs are typically amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of three to five years.

Based on the methodology described above, the fair value of our DET reporting unit exceeded its carrying value; therefore, we did not recognize an impairment charge related to goodwill in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Our market capitalization at the end of our third quarter of fiscal 2010 was approximately $7.5 billion, which exceeded the aggregate carrying value of our reporting units by approximately 400%. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, there were no events or circumstances that would trigger an impairment evaluation due to a reduction in the fair value of our reporting units below their carrying value.

In December 2007, the FASB amended the accounting standards for the consolidation of controlling interests, which changed the presentation requirements for our controlling interest. Our adoption of this accounting standard did not change our accounting for our controlling interest. The amended standards resulted in changes to the presentation of net income in our consolidated statements of operations and the reclassification of controlling interest from the mezzanine to the equity section of our consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented.

In January 2010, the FASB amended the accounting standard for fair value measurements to require new disclosures for transfers of financial assets and liabilities into and out of Levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy and for activity in Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning with our fiscal quarter ended March 26, 2010, except for the disclosures for Level 3 activity, which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods for our fiscal year ending September 28, 2012, with early adoption permitted. We adopted the amended disclosure requirements for Levels 1 and 2 beginning in our fiscal quarter ended March 26, 2010. The adoption of the amended disclosure requirements for fair value measurements did not affect our disclosures because we did not transfer financial assets or liabilities between levels in the fair value hierarchy.

We enter into revenue arrangements with our customers to license technology, trademarks, and know-how and to sell products and services. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable.

Licensing. Our licensing revenue is primarily derived from royalties paid to us by licensees of our intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, and know-how. Royalties are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria have been met. We determine that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement upon the execution of a license agreement or upon the receipt of a licensee’s royalty report and payment. Royalties are deemed fixed or determinable upon verification of a licensee’s royalty report in accordance with

the terms of the underlying executed agreement or, in certain circumstances, receipt of a licensee’s royalty report and payment. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of the licensee’s recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter-of-credit between the licensee’s financial institution and our financial institution and other factors. Corrective royalty statements are accounted for when received, except for corrections of prior royalty statements which are reserved for when a reliable estimate can be made. Deferred revenue represents amounts that are ultimately expected to be recognized as revenue, but for which not all revenue recognition criteria have been met. If we cannot determine that collectibility is probable, we recognize revenue upon receipt of cash, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Licensing revenue includes fees we earn for administering joint patent licensing programs (patent pools) containing patents owned by us and/or other companies. Royalties related to patent pools are recorded net of royalties payable to third party patent pool members and are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria have been met.

We generate the majority of our licensing revenue through our licensing contracts with original equipment manufacturers (system licensees) and software vendors. Our revenue recognition policies for each of these arrangements are summarized below.

Licensing to system licensees. We license our technologies to system licensees who manufacture consumer electronics products and, in return, the system licensee pays us a royalty generally for each unit shipped that incorporates our technologies. Royalties from system licensees are generally recognized upon receipt of a royalty report from the licensee and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. In addition, in some cases we receive initial license fees for our technologies and provide post-contract support. In these cases, we recognize the initial fees ratably over the expected support term.

Licensing to software vendors. We license our technologies for resale to software vendors and, in return, the software vendor pays us a royalty for each unit of software distributed that incorporates our technologies. Royalties from software vendors are generally recognized upon receipt of a royalty report from the licensee and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. In addition, in some cases we receive initial license fees for our technologies and provide post-contract upgrades and support. In these cases, we recognize the initial fees ratably over the expected support term, as vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value typically does not exist for the upgrade and support elements of the contract.

Product Sales. Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when the risk of ownership has transferred to our customer as provided under the terms of the governing purchase agreement, and all the other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Generally, these purchase agreements provide that the risk of ownership is transferred to the customer when the product is shipped, except in specific instances in which certain foreign regulations stipulate that the risk of ownership is transferred to the customer upon their receipt of the shipment. In these instances, we recognize revenue when the product is received by the customer.

Services. Services are recognized as the services related to a given project are completed and all the other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Multiple Element Arrangements. We enter into arrangements that include multiple elements such as hardware, software, maintenance and other services. For some of our arrangements, customers receive certain elements of the arrangement over a period of time or after delivery of the initial product. These elements may include support and maintenance and/or the right to receive product upgrades.

In October 2009, the FASB amended the revenue recognition accounting standards to exclude sales of qualifying tangible products that contain essential software elements from the scope of the software revenue recognition standards. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we adopted this accounting standard for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after September 25, 2009. Due to this adoption, we no longer account for product sales that contain software elements under the software revenue recognition standards.

Also in October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting standards for multiple-element (ME) revenue arrangements to:

Under the new accounting guidance, we allocate the arrangement fees to each element based on its relative selling price, which we establish using a selling price hierarchy. We determine the selling price of each element based on its VSOE, if available, TPE, if VSOE is not available, or ESP, if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. In the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, we established VSOE for a majority of the undelivered elements in our ME arrangements. For these arrangements, the VSOE and the ESP value are essentially the same. For arrangements where VSOE does not exist, we use ESP.

delivered at the time of sale. The second element is the right to receive support and maintenance, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered over a service period subsequent to the initial sale. The application of the new revenue accounting standards to our digital cinema server sales typically results in the allocation of a substantial majority of the arrangement fees to the delivered hardware element based on its ESP, which we recognize as revenue at the time of sale. A small portion of the arrangement fees are allocated to the undelivered support and maintenance element, based on its VSOE or ESP, and is recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated service period.

For ME product arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal year ended September 24, 2010, we recognized revenue of $74.8 million. At September 24, 2010, the deferred revenue balance from these transactions was $2.1 million, representing the estimated selling price of our support and maintenance obligation bundled with our hardware sales.

While our adoption of the amended guidance did not change the accounting for product arrangements entered into on or before September 25, 2009, our ability to establish VSOE for a majority of the undelivered elements resulted in a valuation of our undelivered obligations and a release of revenue using the residual method. Our establishment of VSOE in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 had an insignificant impact on our revenue recognized in the quarter as the majority of revenue recognized in our fourth quarter would have been recognized regardless of establishment of VSOE due to the expiration of the term of our undelivered elements. For product arrangements entered into on or before September 25, 2009, we recognized $29.7 million in previously deferred revenue in the fiscal year ended September 24, 2010. At September 24, 2010, the remaining deferred revenue balance from these transactions was $0.7 million.

The following is a summary of our products revenue and the associated deferred revenue balances:

Cost of licensing. Cost of licensing consists principally of amortization expenses associated with purchased intangible assets and intangible assets acquired in business combinations. Cost of licensing also includes royalty obligations to third parties for the licensing of intellectual property rights that we sublicense as part of our licensing arrangements with our customers.

Cost of products. Cost of products primarily consists of the cost of materials related to products sold, applied labor and manufacturing overhead. Our cost of products also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then include in our products.

Cost of services. Cost of services consists primarily of the payroll and benefit costs of employees performing our professional services, the cost of outside consultants and reimbursable expenses incurred on behalf of customers.

We measure expenses associated with all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair-value method and the recording of such expense in the consolidated financial statements over the requisite service period. In fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of $22.7 million, $22.4 million, and $28.8 million, respectively. See Note 5 “Stockholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation” for further discussion.

Advertising and promotional costs are charged to sales and marketing expense as incurred. These expenses were $11.4 million, $9.7 million and $14.6 million for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

We maintain sales, marketing and business operations in foreign countries. We translate the assets and liabilities of our international non-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period. Revenue and expenses of these subsidiaries are translated using the average rates for the period. Gains and losses from these translations are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

Certain of our foreign subsidiaries transact in currencies other than their functional currency. Foreign transaction gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, we re-measure non-functional currency assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries using the exchange rate at the end of each period and recognize gains and losses in our consolidated statements of operations. These gains and losses are recorded within other income. In fiscal 2008, transaction and re-measurement gains included in net income were $1.0 million. In fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, transaction and re-measurement losses included in net income were $0.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively.

We use the asset and liability method, under which deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwards are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be reversed. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is additionally dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets when uncertainty regarding their realizability exists.

In the beginning of fiscal 2008, we changed the method of accounting for uncertainties in income taxes. Our policy is to record an unrecognized tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. We include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within our provision for income taxes. To the extent accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued are reduced in the period that such determination is made, and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision. See Note 7 “Income Taxes” for further discussion.

Other than the recently issued accounting standard related to fair value disclosures discussed above, no other recently issued accounting standards are expected to have an impact on our current accounting or disclosures.

Cash, cash equivalents, and investments as of September 25, 2009 and September 24, 2010 consisted of the following:

As of September 25, 2009, we held tax-exempt auction rate certificates with a par value of $68.1 million. Since February 2008, auctions for these investments had failed, and the investments were illiquid as a result. In November 2008, we elected to accept a rights offering (Put Rights) from UBS AG, (collectively with its wholly owned subsidiaries UBS Financial Services, Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, referred to as UBS), which provided us with an option to sell to UBS, at par value, our auction rate certificates purchased through UBS at any time during a two-year sale period beginning June 30, 2010. We measured the Put Rights at fair value with gains and losses recognized as a component of net income. Simultaneous with the acceptance of the rights offering, we reclassified our auction rate certificates from the available-for-sale to the trading securities category, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of net income, within long-term investments in our consolidated balance sheet. Our Put Rights were recorded within prepaid expenses and other current assets.

2010, we redeemed and received the full $68.1 million of par value plus accrued interest related to these auction rate certificates. In addition, we recognized gains of $10.9 million, which represented the excess of the par value redeemed over the fair market value of the auction rate certificates. Concurrently, we recognized net losses from the associated Put Rights of $9.5 million in fiscal 2010.

Our investment portfolio, which is recorded as cash equivalents, short-term investments, and long-term investments, was as follows:

We have classified all of our investments listed in the tables above, with the exception of our auction rate certificates, as available-for-sale securities recorded at fair market value on the consolidated balance sheets, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Upon sale, amounts of gains and losses reclassified into earnings are determined based on specific identification of securities sold. Our auction rate certificates were classified as trading securities recorded at fair market value on the consolidated balance sheets, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of net income.

The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and the fair value for those available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position:

The unrealized losses on our available-for-sale securities were primarily a result of unfavorable changes in interest rates subsequent to the initial purchase of these securities. As of September 24, 2010, we owned 24 securities that were in an unrealized loss position. We do not intend to sell, nor will we need to sell, these securities before we recover the associated unrealized losses. We expect to recover the full carrying value of these securities. As a result, we do not consider any portion of the unrealized losses at September 25, 2009 and September 24, 2010 to be an other-than-temporary impairment, nor do we consider any of the unrealized losses to be credit losses.

The increase in accounts receivable from September 25, 2009 to September 24, 2010 was due to the timing of our receipt of licensee statements.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and consist of the following:

In the fiscal year ended September 24, 2010, inventories increased over prior year to support expected higher demand for our products.

Assets held for sale represent digital cinema equipment that we leased to exhibitors beginning in fiscal 2005 in an effort to encourage the cinema industry to transition to digital cinema. In fiscal 2009, all products provided under operating leases were classified as property, plant and equipment, and as described below, an impairment charge of $9.6 million was recognized related to all products provided under operating leases in fiscal 2010.

In the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, management committed to a plan to sell some of this leased equipment, which required us to classify these assets as held for sale as of September 24, 2010. We expect to sell these assets within fiscal 2011 and as such, we have classified the equipment within current assets in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 24, 2010. We believe that the current carrying value of these products is recoverable. Products under operating leases with a carrying value of approximately $1.1 million have not yet met the criteria to be classified as held for sale; accordingly, these assets are classified as held for use and remain within property, plant and equipment.

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and consist of the following:

Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was $12.4 million, $13.5 million and $17.8 million in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, and is included in cost of products, cost of services, research and development expenses, sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Our products provided under operating leases represent digital cinema equipment that we leased to exhibitors beginning in fiscal 2005 in an effort to encourage the cinema industry to transition to digital cinema. In conjunction with our exhibitor lease arrangements, we receive a virtual print fee from participating film studios for each digital print delivered for exhibition on the leased equipment.

We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. During the fiscal quarter ended June 25, 2010, certain events occurred that indicated that the carrying value of our products provided under operating leases may not be recoverable. These events included a reduction in expected virtual print fees and a reduction in market prices for digital cinema equipment. As a result, we concluded that sufficient indicators existed to require an impairment analysis during the fiscal quarter ended June 25, 2010.

Based on our estimates of the undiscounted future cash flows from virtual print fees and the potential sale value of the equipment, our analysis determined that the equipment was impaired. Accordingly, we estimated the fair market value of the equipment based on potential sale price estimates and recorded the excess of the carrying value over the fair market value as an impairment charge. For the fiscal quarter ended June 25, 2010, we recorded an impairment charge of $9.6 million related to our products provided under operating leases, which is included in the impairment of products provided under operating leases line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

During the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, management committed to a plan to sell certain products provided under operating leases which had a carrying value of $5.6 million. These assets have been reclassified as held for sale and included within prepaid expenses and other current assets in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 24, 2010. Assets which have not been identified for sale have a $1.1 million carrying value as of September 24, 2010, and are classified as held for use. We are currently exploring future uses and options for these assets, and have not yet committed to a plan of sale. We believe that the remaining carrying value of our products provided under operating leases included in property, plant and equipment is recoverable as of September 24, 2010.

During the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, management committed to a plan to sell one of our properties in the U.K. that indicated that the carrying value of the land and building may not be recoverable. Based on our estimates of the undiscounted future cash flows from this building, our analysis determined that the building was impaired. Accordingly, we estimated the fair market value of the property based on potential sales price estimates. We recorded the excess of the carrying value over the fair market value of the land and building as impairment charges of $1.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, within the restructuring charges line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The building is held by an entity where we are the managing member and our principal stockholder is the limited member, but with a majority ownership of the entity. Therefore, the impairment amount reflected in our restructuring charges line item is offset by the share of the charge attributable to the limited member, or $1.7 million, in our net income attributable to controlling interest line item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Based on the current facts and circumstances, the property does not meet the criteria for held for sale classification.

During the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, we acquired a company for a total purchase price of $5.8 million. Based on an allocation of the purchase price, goodwill and intangible assets resulting from this acquisition amounted to approximately $3.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively.

Amortization expense for our intangible assets was $12.5 million, $15.2 million and $17.3 million, in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, and is included in cost of licensing, cost of products, research and development and sales and marketing expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The expected future annual amortization expense of our intangible assets is as follows:

Accumulated foreign currency translation gains, net of tax, were $9.4 million at September 26, 2008, $7.3 million and $6.2 million as of September 25, 2009 and September 24, 2010, respectively. Accumulated unrealized losses on investments, net of tax, were $4.7 million at September 26, 2008. Accumulated unrealized gains on investments, net of tax, were $2.2 million and $1.6 million as of September 25, 2009 and September 24, 2010, respectively.

We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period. For diluted earnings per share, we divide net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding and the potential number of dilutive shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.:

We have excluded 2,019,329, 3,409,432 and 2,074,447 options from the calculation of potential common shares for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. We have excluded 40,263, 147,989 and 456,715 restricted stock units from the calculation of potential common shares for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

We recognize licensing revenue gross of withholding taxes, which our licensees remit directly to their local tax authorities. Withholding tax remittances were $17.6 million, $22.8 million and $31.6 million in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. We account for sales tax on a net basis by excluding sales tax from our revenue.

Through the fiscal quarter ended June 25, 2010, we maintained three term loans through our consolidated affiliates Dolby Properties, LLC, Dolby Properties Burbank, LLC and Dolby Properties United Kingdom, LLC, for financing commercial and real property at various locations in which we are the primary tenant. The loans were collateralized by the commercial real property and were guaranteed by Dolby Laboratories, Inc. During the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010, we repaid all debt outstanding.

For a discussion of the litigation settlement, refer to Note 12 “Legal Proceedings.” See Note 7 “Income Taxes” for additional information related to tax liabilities.

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We minimize the use of unobservable inputs and use observable market data, if available, when determining fair value. We classify our inputs to measure fair value using the following three-level hierarchy:

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of September 25, 2009 are classified below:

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of September 24, 2010 are classified below:

We base the fair value of our Level 1 financial instruments on active quoted market prices for identical instruments. Our Level 1 financial instruments include money market funds and mutual fund investments held in our supplemental retirement plan. We obtain the fair value of our Level 2 financial instruments from professional pricing sources for identical or comparable instruments, rather than direct observations of quoted prices in active markets. We classified our auction rate certificates and Put Rights as Level 3 financial assets because quoted prices were unobservable or no market data was available.

The following table provides a reconciliation between the beginning and ending balances of items measured at fair value that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

The realized gains from release of credit risk discount on Put Rights and redemption of Put Rights are included in the other expense, net line item in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended September 24, 2010.

Our board of directors has authorized two classes of common stock, Class A and Class B. At September 24, 2010, we had authorized 500,000,000 Class A shares and 500,000,000 Class B shares. At September 24, 2010, we had 52,856,440 shares of Class A common stock and 59,227,599 shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding. Holders of our Class A and Class B common stock have identical rights, except that holders of our Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share.

Shares of Class B common stock can be converted to shares of Class A common stock at any time at the option of the stockholder and automatically convert upon sale or transfer, except for certain transfers specified in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

2000 Stock Incentive Plan. Effective October 2000, we adopted the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended in April 2004 and September 2004, provides for the issuance of incentive and nonqualified stock options to employees, directors and consultants of Dolby Laboratories to purchase up to 15.1 million shares of Class B common stock. Under the terms of this plan, options became exercisable as established by the board of directors (ratably over four years), and expire ten years after the date of the grant. Options granted under the plan were granted at not less than fair market value at the date of grant.

As of September 24, 2010, there were options outstanding to purchase 0.8 million shares of Class B common stock, of which all were vested and exercisable. The options outstanding have a remaining weighted-average contractual life of 3.5 years. Subsequent to fiscal 2005, no further options were granted and no further options will be granted under this plan.

2005 Stock Plan. In January 2005, our stockholders approved our 2005 Stock Plan, which our board of directors adopted in November 2004. The 2005 Stock Plan became effective on February 16, 2005, the day prior to the completion of our initial public offering. Our 2005 Stock Plan, as amended in February 2008, provides for the ability to grant incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock units, performance units, performance bonus awards and performance shares. A total of 12.0 million shares of our Class A common stock is authorized for issuance under the 2005 Stock Plan. Any shares subject to an award with a per share price less than the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant and any shares subject to an outstanding restricted stock unit award will be counted against the authorized share reserve as two shares for every one share subject to the award, and if returned to the 2005 Stock Plan, such shares will be counted as two shares for every one share returned.

As of September 24, 2010, there were options outstanding to purchase 4.9 million shares of Class A common stock, of which 1.6 million were vested and exercisable. The options outstanding have a remaining weighted-average contractual life of 7.9 years.

We provide stock-based awards as a form of compensation for employees, officers, and directors. We have issued stock-based awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan.

Stock-based compensation expense recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010 were as follows:

Stock Options. We have granted stock options to our employees, officers and directors under our 2005 Stock Plan and our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. Stock options are generally granted at fair market value on the date of grant. Options granted to employees and officers prior to June 2008 generally vest over four years, with equal annual cliff-vesting and expire on the earlier of 10 years after the date of grant or 3 months after termination of service. Options granted to employees and officers from June 2008 onward generally vest over four years, with each option becoming exercisable as to 25% of the number of shares subject to the option on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the balance of the shares subject to the option vesting in equal monthly installments over the next 36 months thereafter, and expire on the earlier of 10 years after the date of grant or 3 months after termination of service. Options granted to outside directors generally vest over 3 years with equal annual cliff vesting and expire on the earlier of 10 years after the date of grant or three months after termination of service. All options granted vest over the requisite service period and upon the exercise of stock options, we issue new shares of Class B common stock under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and new shares of Class A common stock under the 2005 Stock Plan. Our 2005 Stock Plan also allows us to grant stock awards which vest based on the satisfaction of specific performance criteria.

On February 16, 2010, pursuant to a contractual agreement, we granted 16,651 stock options to our Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. The size of the grant was determined by our Compensation Committee in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, and was based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of his achievement of performance goals relating to leadership, counseling and technology consulting. The stock options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Class A common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of these options was $0.3 million. In each of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, we recorded $0.1 million in stock-based compensation expense related to this contractual agreement with our Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors.

Additionally, our Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors is eligible to receive a stock option grant on February 15, 2011 giving him the right to purchase a certain number of the Company’s Class A common shares with a fair value, as measured by the Black-Scholes model, between $0.1 million and $0.3 million as of the date of grant. These stock options are subject to the same terms as the previous grant. In fiscal 2010, we recorded $0.1 million in stock-based compensation expense related to this contractual agreement with our Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors.

We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of employee stock options at the date of grant. The fair value of our stock-based awards was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:

To determine an estimate for the expected term of our stock options, we evaluated historical exercise patterns of our employees and made an assumption regarding future exercise patterns. To determine an estimate for the expected stock price volatility for stock options, we utilized a blend of the historical volatility for our common stock since our initial public offering and our implied volatility. To determine an estimate for the risk-free interest rate we used an average interest rate based on U.S. Treasury instruments having terms consistent with the expected term of our awards.

The following table summarizes the weighted-average fair value of stock options granted and the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010:

Included in stock-based compensation expense was $20.5 million, $16.6 million and $18.1 million for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, related to employee stock options, net of estimated forfeitures. We determine our estimated forfeiture rate based on an evaluation of historical forfeitures. For awards granted in fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, we utilized an estimated forfeiture rate of 4.84%, 5.13%, and 5.69%, respectively. Total unrecorded stock-based compensation cost at September 24, 2010 associated with employee stock options expected to vest was $45.9 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.

The following table summarizes information about stock options issued to officers, directors, and employees under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2005 Stock Plan:

Aggregate intrinsic value is based on the closing price of our common stock on September 24, 2010 of $61.74 and excludes the impact of options that were not in-the-money.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 24, 2010:

Restricted Stock Units. We grant restricted stock units to certain employees, officers and directors under our 2005 Stock Plan. Awards granted to employees and officers generally vest over four years, with equal annual cliff-vesting and awards granted to directors generally vest over three years, with equal annual cliff-vesting. Our 2005 Stock Plan also allows us to grant restricted stock units which vest based on the satisfaction of specific performance criteria, although no such awards have been granted as of September 24, 2010. At each vesting date, the holder of the award is issued shares of our Class A common stock. Compensation expense from these awards is equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and is recognized over the requisite service period. No restricted stock units were granted prior to fiscal 2008. Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units was $1.8 million, $5.2 million, and $9.6 million in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Total unrecorded stock-based compensation cost at September 24, 2010 associated with restricted stock units expected to vest was $28.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.0 years.

The following table summarizes information about restricted stock units issued to officers, directors and employees under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan:

Stock Appreciation Rights. We have granted stock appreciation rights to certain of our foreign employees. These awards are settled in cash rather than stock, and are classified as liability awards. Stock-based compensation expense related to stock appreciation rights was $0.2 million in fiscal 2008, less than $0.1 million in fiscal 2009 and $0.4 million in fiscal 2010.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In January 2005, our board of directors adopted and our stockholders approved our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), which allows eligible employees to have up to 10 percent of their eligible compensation withheld and used to purchase Class A common stock, subject to a maximum of $25,000 worth of stock purchased in a calendar year or no more than one thousand shares in an offering period, whichever is less. The plan provides for a purchase price equal to 85 percent of the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the last day of the purchase period. Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase Class A common stock through payroll withholdings. In fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, we recorded compensation expense of $0.2 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million for our ESPP, respectively. Our ESPP does not have a look-back option and is classified as a liability award. At September 24, 2010, our accrued liabilities included $2.0 million for employee withholdings and related compensation cost.

In fiscal 2009, we ceased using two of Cinea’s leased facilities in Virginia, terminated employees and integrated Cinea into our Dolby Entertainment Technology reporting unit. This activity resulted in severance and other charges attributable to the termination of employees and facilities charges relating to non-cancelable lease costs, net of expected sublease income.

In fiscal 2009, we also undertook a restructuring project to reallocate our global manufacturing resources. As part of this restructuring project, we consolidated our Wootton Bassett, U.K. manufacturing operations into our Brisbane, California facility in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, which resulted in a reduced manufacturing workforce. In addition, we reduced our workforce in our Brisbane, California manufacturing facility. These activities resulted in severance and other charges attributable to the termination of employees.

Changes in our restructuring accruals in fiscal 2009, which are included within accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of September 25, 2009, were as follows:

In fiscal 2010, approximately 60 general and administrative employees were impacted by our plans to reorganize certain aspects of our global business operations and are reflected in the restructuring charges in the table above. As a result of this action, we have offered severance benefits to the affected employees. The majority of these employees are required to render service through November 15, 2010 to receive these severance benefits. We are recognizing the total estimated severance and other associated costs of approximately $4.4 million for these employees on a ratable basis through this date.

We have recorded $3.4 million of impairment within the Restructuring Charges line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to one of our buildings held in the UK. See Note 3 “Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions” for further information.

Changes in our restructuring accruals in fiscal 2010, which are included within accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of September 24, 2010, were as follows:

Licensing revenue is recognized gross of foreign withholding taxes that are remitted by our licensees directly to foreign tax authorities. Withholding taxes were $17.6 million, $22.8 million and $31.6 million in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The foreign current tax includes this withholding tax expense and a corresponding foreign tax credit benefit is included in current federal taxes.

United States income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on a cumulative total of $1.0 million of undistributed earnings for certain non-United States subsidiaries. We intend to reinvest these earnings indefinitely in operations outside the United States. A determination of the amount of the deferred tax liability that is essentially permanent in duration is not practicable.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A summary of the tax effects of the temporary differences is as follows:

Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, we believe it is more likely than not that the benefits of these deductible differences will be realized and, therefore, a valuation allowance is not required.

As of September 24, 2010, we had net operating loss carryovers for Australia tax purposes of $3.1 million. These loss carryovers have no expiration dates. As part of an acquisition in April 2009, we acquired net operating loss carryovers for Federal and California tax purposes of $9.7 million and $9.6 million, respectively. The losses carried forward for Federal and California tax purposes as of September 24, 2010 were $8.1 million and $9.6 million, respectively, and will expire in fiscal 2029 if unused.

A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to our effective tax rate for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, is as follows:

As of September 24, 2010, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $16.6 million, of which $10.6 million, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate. Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits are classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

The aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were as follows:

The increase in the balance for unrecognized tax benefits at September 24, 2010 primarily relates to differences between benefits claimed on the Company's returns expected to be filed for fiscal 2010 and amounts recognized on the financial statements.

To the extent accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued will be reduced in the period that such determination is made and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision. At September 25, 2009, we had $1.7 million of accrued interest and $2.6 million of accrued penalties on unrecognized tax benefits. At September 24, 2010, we had $0.9 million of accrued interest and $2.6 million of accrued penalties on unrecognized tax benefits. Our current tax provision was reduced by penalties of less than $0.1 million plus interest expense of $0.8 million.

We file income tax returns in the United States on a federal basis and in several U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. Our three most significant tax jurisdictions are the U.S., United Kingdom (U.K.), and state of California. Our tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time

following the tax year to which those filings relate. We are no longer subject to examinations by the Internal Revenue Service through the 2003 tax year, for U.S. federal tax purposes, and through the 2006 fiscal year by the appropriate governmental agencies for U.K. tax purposes. In addition, we are no longer subject to examination by the state of New York through the 2005 tax year for income tax purposes. Our California filings are no longer subject to examination through the 2003 tax year by the appropriate California agency. Other significant jurisdictions include Australia, Canada and Sweden and they are no longer subject to examinations through the year 2003, 2006 and 2007, respectively. We do not believe that the outcome of any ongoing examination will have a material impact on our financial statements.

We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing income tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expected tolling of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions. Considering these facts, we do not currently believe there is a reasonable possibility of any significant change to our total unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

We maintain a tax-qualified 401(k) retirement plan for employees in the United States, and similar plans in foreign jurisdictions. Retirement plan expenses were $8.9 million, $9.2 million and $11.1 million for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Retirement plan expenses are included in cost of products, cost of services, sales and marketing, general and administrative and research and development expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The following table presents a summary of our contractual obligations and commitments as of September 24, 2010:

Rental expenses under operating leases were $7.7 million, $7.9 million and $8.7 million for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. These amounts include expenses for rent payable to our principal stockholder of $1.4 million, $1.3 million and $1.4 million for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

We are party to certain contractual agreements under which we have agreed to provide indemnifications of varying scope and duration to the other party relating to our licensed intellectual property. Historically, we

have made no payments for these indemnification obligations and no amounts have been accrued in our consolidated financial statements with respect to these obligations. Due to their varying terms and conditions, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount we could be required to pay.

We operate as a single reportable segment on an enterprise-wide basis. We generate revenue by licensing our technologies to manufacturers of CE products and to software vendors, and selling our professional products and related services to entertainment content creators, producers, and distributors.

Revenue by geographic region, which was determined based on the location of our licensees for licensing revenue, the location of our direct customers or distributors for products revenue, and the location where we perform our services for services revenue, was as follows:

The concentration of our revenue from individual geographic regions was as follows:

In fiscal 2008 and 2009, one customer accounted for approximately 10% of our total revenue and in fiscal 2010 the same customer accounted for 12% of total revenue.

Long-lived tangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation, by geographic region were as follows:

Shares of Class A common stock were purchased under a $250.0 million stock repurchase program announced by the Company on November 3, 2009, which was increased by an additional $300.0 million announced on July 27, 2010. Stock repurchases under this program may be made through open market transactions, negotiated purchases, or otherwise, at times and in amounts that we consider appropriate. The timing of repurchases and the number of shares repurchased depend upon a variety of factors including price,

regulatory requirements, and other market conditions. We may limit, suspend, or terminate the stock repurchase program at any time without prior notice. This program does not have a specified expiration date. Shares repurchased under the program will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Class A common stock. Stock repurchases under the stock repurchase program commenced in the fiscal quarter ended December 25, 2009.

Stock repurchase activity under the stock repurchase program during fiscal 2010 is summarized as follows:

In March 1997, an unrelated third party filed a lawsuit against us alleging breach of a written agreement. In April 2002, we settled the dispute and agreed to pay a total of $30.0 million, without interest, in ten equal annual installments of $3.0 million per year beginning in June 2002. We recorded this liability at its present value of $24.2 million on the consolidated balance sheet. Interest related to this liability is recorded quarterly and is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Other than such payments, neither party has any material obligations as a result of the settlement. As of September 24, 2010, we had $3.0 million remaining to be paid under this settlement.

We lease our primary San Francisco corporate offices from our principal stockholder. The current lease expires on December 31, 2013, but we have the option to renew the lease for two additional five-year terms. Rent to related parties for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, was $1.4 million, $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively.

We are the managing member or general partner in entities which own and lease commercial property in the United States and United Kingdom. Our principal stockholder is the limited member or limited partner, but with a majority economic interest, in each of these entities. These entities were established for the purposes of purchasing and leasing commercial property primarily for our own use. While a portion of the property is leased to third parties, we occupy a majority of the space. Therefore, given that these affiliated entities are an integrated part of our operations, we have consolidated the entities’ assets and liabilities and results of operations in our consolidated financial statements. The share of earnings and net assets of the entities attributable to the limited member or limited partner, as the case may be, is reflected as controlling interest in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These entities distributed approximately $0.3 million in each of fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010 to our principal stockholder. During fiscal 2010, we paid off in full the debt used to finance the purchases of property. See Note 3 “Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions” for further information of the debt repayment.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Subject to the limitations noted above, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to meet the objective for which they were designed and operate at the reasonable assurance level.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 24, 2010 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) in its Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment and those criteria, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 24, 2010.

Our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein on page 58.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The information required by this item concerning our directors, compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act, our code of ethics and Nominating and Governance Committee and Audit Committee is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the sections under the headings “Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Corporate Governance Matters” in our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2011 (the "2011 Proxy Statement").

Our executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The names of our executive officers and their ages, titles, and biographies as of November 4, 2010 are set forth below:

Peter Gotcher has served as a director since 2003 and as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors since March 2009. Mr. Gotcher is an independent investor. Mr. Gotcher was a venture partner with Redpoint Ventures, a private investment firm, from September 1999 to January 2003. Prior to joining Redpoint Ventures, Mr. Gotcher was a venture partner with Institutional Venture Partners, a private investment firm, from 1997 to September 1999. Prior to joining Institutional Venture Partners, Mr. Gotcher founded and served as the president, chief executive officer and chairman of the board of Digidesign from 1984 to 1995. Digidesign was acquired by Avid Technology, Inc., a media software company, in 1995 and Mr. Gotcher served as the general manager of Digidesign and executive vice president of Avid Technology from January 1995 to May 1996. Mr. Gotcher serves on the boards of directors of several private companies. Mr. Gotcher holds a B.A. degree in English literature from the University of California at Berkeley.

Kevin Yeaman joined us as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President in October 2005 and became our President and CEO in March 2009. Prior to joining us, Mr. Yeaman worked for seven years at E.piphany, Inc., a publicly traded enterprise software company, most recently as Chief Financial Officer from August 1999 to October 2005. Previously, Mr. Yeaman served as Worldwide Vice President of Field Finance Operations for Informix Software, Inc., a provider of relational database software from February 1998 to August 1998. From September 1988 to February 1998, Mr. Yeaman served in Silicon Valley and London in various positions at KPMG LLP, an accounting firm, serving most recently as a senior manager. Mr. Yeaman holds a BS degree in commerce from Santa Clara University.

Mark Anderson joined us as our Vice President, General Counsel in November 2003, was appointed our Corporate Secretary in March 2004, Senior Vice President in November 2006 and Executive Vice President in July 2007. Prior to joining us, Mr. Anderson was an associate and then a partner at the law firm of Farella Braun & Martel LLP, from August 1989 to November 2003. Mr. Anderson is a certified public accountant and holds a B.S. degree in business administration from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a J.D. from Golden Gate University School of Law.

Murray Demo joined us as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in May 2009. Prior to joining us, Mr. Demo served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at LiveOps, Inc., an

on-demand contact center software and call center outsourcing company, from September 2007 to July 2008. Prior to that, from May 2007 to September 2007, Mr. Demo was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Postini, Inc., an on-demand messaging and security compliance software company now part of Google Inc. Before Postini, Mr. Demo spent ten years with Adobe Systems Inc., from August 1996 to December 2006, where Mr. Demo’s last role was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Demo sits on the board of directors of Citrix Systems, Inc. Mr. Demo holds a BA degree in business economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara and an MBA degree from Golden Gate University.

Ramzi Haidamus has served as our Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing, since August 2007. Previously, Mr. Haidamus served in a variety of other positions since joining us in 1996, including as the Senior Vice President and General Manager of our consumer division, as the President and General Manger of our wholly owned subsidiary, Via Licensing Corporation, and as our Director of Business Development, Technology and Business Strategist, and Licensing Manager. Prior to joining us, Mr. Haidamus worked at Stanford Research Systems for seven years. Mr. Haidamus holds a B.S. degree in electrical engineering and a M.S. degree in computer engineering from the University of the Pacific. Mr. Haidamus is a member of the Licensing Executives Society.

Michael Rockwell joined us as our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Engineering in October 2007 and was appointed our Executive Vice President, Products and Technologies in March 2009. Prior to joining us, from October 2000 to August 2007, Mr. Rockwell was Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Avid Technology, Inc. Prior to his appointment as Chief Technology Officer, from April 1994 to October 1999, Mr. Rockwell served as Chief Architect of Software Engineering at Digidesign, which was acquired by Avid Technology, Inc. in 1995. Before Digidesign, Mr. Rockwell was the president and owner of a software business and audio/visual production company, Rockwell Digital.

The information required by this item concerning executive compensation is incorporated by reference from the information in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Corporate Governance Matters” and “Executive Compensation—Compensation Committee Report.”

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans and security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from the information in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the headings “Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item concerning transactions with related persons and director independence is incorporated by reference from the information in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the headings “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and “Corporate Governance Matters”

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the heading “Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Principal Accounting Fees and Services.”

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

By:		/s/ MURRAY J. DEMO
		Murray J. Demo
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Kevin J. Yeaman and Murray J. Demo, his attorney-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connections therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and conforming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue of hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Delaware		90-0199783
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
100 Potrero Avenue San Francisco, CA		94103-4813
(Address of principal executive offices)		( Zip Code)


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value		The New York Stock Exchange


Large accelerated filer x		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company ¨


	Fiscal 2009				Fiscal 2010
	High		Low		High		Low
First Quarter	$	35.20	$	24.86	$	47.80	$	37.25
Second Quarter		34.91		25.50		59.73		47.02
Third Quarter		40.13		33.42		69.72		58.09
Fourth Quarter		42.10		34.86		70.14		52.19


	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
June 26, 2010 - July 23, 2010		330,550	$	65.30		330,550	$50.8 million
July 24, 2010 - August 20, 2010		323,022		61.42		323,022	$331.0 million
August 21, 2010 - September 24, 2010		395,371		56.33		395,371	$308.7 million

Total		1,048,943				1,048,943


PART I
Item1	–	Business	1
Item1A	–	Risk Factors	15
Item1B	–	Unresolved Staff Comments	35
Item 2	–	Properties	35
Item 3	–	Legal Proceedings	35
Item 4	–	(Removed and Reserved)	35

PART II
Item 5	–	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	36
Item 6	–	Selected Financial Data	39
Item 7	–	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	40
Item 7A	–	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	55
Item 8	–	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	56
Item 9	–	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	94
Item 9A	–	Controls and Procedures	94
Item 9B	–	Other Information	95

PART III
Item 10	–	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	96
Item 11	–	Executive Compensation	97
Item 12	–	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	97
Item 13	–	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	97
Item 14	–	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	97

PART IV
Item 15	–	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	98
Signatures			99


	Fiscal Year End
	September 29, 2006		September 28, 2007		September 26, 2008		September 25, 2009		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operations:
Revenue	$	391,542	$	482,028	$	640,231	$	719,503	$	922,713
Gross margin (1)		315,500		407,763		572,454		654,735		790,898
Operating expenses (2)		185,917		220,811		285,671		291,069		361,517
Income before provision for income taxes		146,637		209,416		301,802		371,419		437,012
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.		89,549		142,831		199,458		242,991		283,447
Net income per share
Basic	$	0.85	$	1.31	$	1.79	$	2.15	$	2.50
Diluted	$	0.80	$	1.26	$	1.74	$	2.11	$	2.46
Weighted-average shares outstanding
Basic		105,688		109,202		111,492		113,101		113,452
Diluted		111,658		113,573		114,781		115,367		115,388
Stock-based compensation included above was as follows:
(1) Cost of sales	$	1,313	$	1,059	$	1,030	$	679	$	553
(2) Operating expenses		17,825		18,782		21,680		21,743		28,262

	September 29, 2006		September 28, 2007		September 26, 2008		September 25, 2009		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	363,537	$	368,467	$	394,761	$	451,678	$	545,861
Working capital		479,778		590,214		491,196		744,254		894,657
Short-term and long-term investments		155,071		304,441		300,663		489,746		493,106
Total assets		739,288		991,697		1,336,146		1,581,315		1,711,772
Long-term debt		10,893		9,691		7,782		5,825		—
Total stockholders’ equity—Dolby Laboratories, Inc.		594,288		797,156		1,049,253		1,341,108		1,473,737


	Fiscal Year Ended			Change						Fiscal Year Ended			Change					Fiscal Year Ended
	September 26, 2008			$			%			September 25, 2009			$		%			September 24, 2010
	($ in thousands)
Licensing	$	537,363		$	57,334			11	%	$	594,697		$	115,777		19	%	$	710,474
Percentage of total revenue		84	%								83	%							77	%
Products		72,284			23,683			33	%		95,967			84,435		88	%		180,402
Percentage of total revenue		11	%								13	%							20	%
Services		30,584			(1,745	)		(6	)%		28,839			2,998		10	%		31,837
Percentage of total revenue		5	%								4	%							3	%

Total revenue	$	640,231		$	79,272			12	%	$	719,503		$	203,210		28	%	$	922,713


	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 26, 2008			September 25, 2009			September 24, 2010
	($ in thousands)
Cost of licensing	$	15,802		$	14,803		$	17,565
Gain from amended patent licensing agreement		—			(20,041	)		—
Licensing gross margin percentage		97	%		101	%		98	%
Licensing gross margin percentage excluding gain from amended patent licensing		97	%		98	%		98	%
Cost of products		39,455			57,220			90,695
Products gross margin percentage		45	%		40	%		50	%
Cost of services		12,520			12,786			13,961
Services gross margin percentage		59	%		56	%		56	%
Impairment of products provided under operating leases		—			—			9,594

Total gross margin percentage, excluding gain from amended patent licensing agreement		89	%		88	%		86	%


	Fiscal Year Ended			Change						Fiscal Year Ended			Change						Fiscal Year Ended
	September 26, 2008			$			%			September 25, 2009			$			%			September 24, 2010
	($ in thousands)
Interest income	$	17,889		$	(6,624	)		(37	)%	$	11,265		$	(3,967	)		(35	)%	$	7,298
Interest expense		(2,126	)		1,191			56	%		(935	)		232			25	%		(703	)
Other income/(expense), net		(744	)		(1,833	)		246	%		(2,577	)		3,613			(140	)%		1,036

Total other income, net	$	15,019		$	(7,266	)		(48	)%	$	7,753		$	(122	)		(2	)%	$	7,631


	Payments Due By Period
	1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		More than 5 Years		Total
Operating leases (1)	$	6,882	$	11,612	$	4,835	$	1,551	$	24,880
Payments on litigation settlements (2)		3,000		—		—		—		3,000
Purchase obligations (3)		3,438								3,438

Total	$	13,320	$	11,612	$	4,835	$	1,551	$	31,318


Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			57

Consolidated Balance Sheets			59

Consolidated Statements of Operations			60

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income			61

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows			62

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			63


	September 25, 2009		September 24, 2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	451,678	$	545,861
Short-term investments		283,808		302,269
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,222 at September 25, 2009 and $2,040 at September 24, 2010		22,981		54,257
Inventories		12,975		28,338
Deferred taxes		83,438		102,758
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		45,958		26,930

Total current assets		900,838		1,060,413
Long-term investments		205,938		190,837
Property, plant, and equipment, net		92,178		94,097
Intangible assets, net		82,035		67,019
Goodwill		261,121		264,580
Deferred taxes		23,755		19,948
Other non-current assets		15,450		14,878

Total assets	$	1,581,315	$	1,711,772

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	12,921	$	3,606
Accrued liabilities		100,901		144,608
Income taxes payable		3,934		7,895
Current portion of long-term debt		1,624		—
Deferred revenue		37,204		9,647

Total current liabilities		156,584		165,756
Long-term debt, net of current portion		5,825		—
Long-term deferred revenue		10,759		12,775
Deferred taxes		13,573		11,547
Other non-current liabilities		31,469		27,015

Total liabilities		218,210		217,093
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value, one vote per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized: 53,412,121 shares issued and outstanding at September 25, 2009 and 52,856,440 at September 24, 2010		53		53
Class B common stock. $0.001 par value, ten votes per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized: 60,437,054 shares issued and outstanding at September 25, 2009 and 59,227,599 at September 24, 2010		60		59
Additional paid-in capital		478,979		329,902
Retained earnings		852,475		1,135,922
Accumulated other comprehensive income		9,541		7,801

Total stockholders’ equity—Dolby Laboratories, Inc.		1,341,108		1,473,737
Controlling interest		21,997		20,942

Total stockholders’ equity		1,363,105		1,494,679

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,581,315	$	1,711,772


	Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
	Shares of Class A common stock			Class A common stock			Shares of Class B common stock			Class B common stock			Additional paid-in capital			Retained earnings			Accumulated other comprehensive income			Total Dolby Laboratories, Inc.			Controlling Interest			Total			Comprehensive Income
Balance at September 28, 2007		49,352		$	49			60,898		$	61		$	375,830		$	409,749		$	11,467		$	797,156		$	22,279		$	819,435			—
Tax reserve adjustment upon change in method of accounting for uncertainties in income taxes		—			—			—			—			—			288			—			288			—			288			—
Net income		—			—			—			—			—			199,458			—			199,458			1,574			201,032			201,032
Translation adjustments, net of taxes of $603		—			—			—			—			—			—			(1,882	)		(1,882	)		(1,422	)		(3,304	)		(3,304	)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $1,630		—			—			—			—			—			—			(4,846	)		(4,846	)		—			(4,846	)		(4,846	)
Distributions to controlling interest		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(333	)		(333	)		—
Stock-based compensation expense		—			—			—			—			22,332			—			—			22,332			—			22,332			—
Tax benefit from the exercise of Class A and Class B stock options		—			—			—			—			22,061			—			—			22,061			—			22,061			—
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans, net of stock withheld for taxes		886			1			—			—			10,768			—			—			10,769			—			10,769			—
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock		1,754			2			(1,754	)		(2	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Exercise of Class B stock options		—			—			1,338			1			3,916			—			—			3,917			—			3,917			—

Balance at September 26, 2008		51,992			52			60,482			60			434,907			609,495			4,739			1,049,253			22,098			1,071,351			192,882

Net income		—			—			—			—			—			242,991			—			242,991			1,355			244,346			244,346
Retirement of treasury stock		—			—			—			—			11			(11	)		—			—			—			—			—
Adjustment to controlling interest		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			575			575			—
Translation adjustments, net of taxes of $3		—			—			—			—			—			—			(2,092	)		(2,092	)		(1,774	)		(3,866	)		(3,866	)
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $(2,931)		—			—			—			—			—			—			6,894			6,894			—			6,894			6,894
Distributions to controlling interest		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(257	)		(257	)		—
Stock-based compensation expense		—			—			—			—			21,758			—			—			21,758			—			21,758			—
Tax benefit from the exercise of Class A and Class B stock options and vesting of restricted stock units		—			—			—			—			5,085			—			—			5,085			—			5,085			—
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans, net of stock withheld for taxes		722			1			—			—			15,613			—			—			15,614			—			15,614			—
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock		698			—			(698	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Exercise of Class B stock options		—			—			653			—			1,605			—			—			1,605			—			1,605			—

Balance at September 25, 2009		53,412			53			60,437			60			478,979			852,475			9,541			1,341,108			21,997			1,363,105			247,374

Net income		—			—			—			—			—			283,447			—			283,447			(620	)		282,827			282,827
Translation adjustments, net of taxes of $2,654		—			—			—			—			—			—			(1,118	)		(1,118	)		(172	)		(1,290	)		(1,290	)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $379		—			—			—			—			—			—			(622	)		(622	)		—			(622	)		(622	)
Distributions to controlling interest		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(263	)		(263	)		—
Stock-based compensation expense		—			—			—			—			27,694			—			—			27,694			—			27,694			—
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense		—			—			—			—			827			—			—			827			—			827			—
Repurchase of common stock		(4,148	)		(4	)		—			—			(241,358	)		—			—			(241,362	)		—			(241,362	)		—
Tax benefit from the exercise of Class A and Class B stock options and vesting of restricted stock units		—			—			—			—			24,134			—			—			24,134			—			24,134			—
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans, net of stock withheld for taxes		1,369			2			—			—			37,222			—			—			37,224			—			37,224			—
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock		2,223			2			(2,223	)		(2	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Exercise of Class B stock options		—			—			1,014			1			2,404			—			—			2,405			—			2,405			—

Balance at September 24, 2010		52,856		$	53			59,228		$	59		$	329,902		$	1,135,922		$	7,801		$	1,473,737		$	20,942		$	1,494,679		$	280,915


Systems and software		3 to 5 years
Machinery and equipment		3 to 15 years
Furniture and fixtures		5 to 8 years
Equipment under operating leases		15 years
Leasehold improvements		Lesser of useful life or related lease term
Buildings		Up to 40 years


	Revenue		Deferred Revenue
	Fiscal year ended September 24, 2010		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Products sold during fiscal 2010:
Multiple-element arrangements	$	74,832	$	2,061
Standalone arrangements (1)		75,840		249
Products sold in prior periods for which revenue was deferred (2)		29,730		717

Total	$	180,402	$	3,027


	September 25, 2009
	Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Auction rate certificates	$	57,254	$	—	$	—		$	57,254
Corporate bonds		22,403		252		—			22,655
Money market funds		318,906		—		—			318,906
Municipal debt securities		233,320		2,667		(18	)		235,969
U.S. agency securities		42,515		480		—			42,995
U.S. government bonds		50,431		213		—			50,644
Variable rate demand notes		80,229		—		—			80,229

Cash equivalents and investments	$	805,058	$	3,612	$	(18	)	$	808,652


	September 24, 2010
	Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Commercial paper	$	29,983	$	—	$	—		$	29,983
Corporate bonds		29,238		420		—			29,658
Money market funds		354,428		—		—			354,428
Municipal debt securities		318,825		1,781		(25	)		320,581
U.S. agency securities		107,512		390		(4	)		107,898
U.S. government bonds		39,949		30		—			39,979

Cash equivalents and investments	$	879,935	$	2,621	$	(29	)	$	882,527


	September 25, 2009
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
Municipal debt securities	$	8,405	$	(18	)	$	—	$	—	$	8,405	$	(18	)

Total	$	8,405	$	(18	)	$	—	$	—	$	8,405	$	(18	)


	September 24, 2010
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
U.S. agency securities	$	30,112	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—	$	30,112	$	(4	)
Municipal debt securities		62,494		(25	)		—		—		62,494		(25	)

Total	$	92,606	$	(29	)	$	—	$	—	$	92,606	$	(29	)


Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	Balance at Beginning of Fiscal Year		Charged to Operations		Deductions			Balance at End of Fiscal Year
	(in thousands)
For fiscal year ended September 26, 2008	$	903	$	935	$	(39	)	$	1,799
For fiscal year ended September 25, 2009		1,799		1,392		(969	)		2,222
For fiscal year ended September 24, 2010		2,222		365		(547	)		2,040


	Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 26, 2008	$	250,356
Acquired goodwill		10,522
Translation adjustments and other		243

Balance at September 25, 2009	$	261,121
Acquired goodwill		3,266
Translation adjustments and other		193

Balance at September 24, 2010	$	264,580


Fiscal Year	Amortization Expense
	(in thousands)
2011	$	16,821
2012		12,576
2013		11,632
2014		11,083
2015		7,304
Thereafter		7,603

Total	$	67,019


Level 1:		Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible by us at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2:		Prices not directly accessible by us. Such prices may be based upon quoted prices in active markets or inputs not quoted on active markets but are corroborated by market data.

Level 3:		Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available and reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	3,935	$	—	$	—	$	3,935
Money market funds (2)		318,906		—		—		318,906
Corporate bonds (2)		—		22,655		—		22,655
Forward currency contract (1)		—		14		—		14
Municipal debt securities (2)		—		235,969		—		235,969
U.S. agency securities (2)		—		42,995		—		42,995
U.S. government bonds (2)		—		50,644		—		50,644
Variable rate demand notes (2)		—		80,229		—		80,229
Auction rate certificates (2)		—		—		57,254		57,254
Put Rights (1)		—		—		9,508		9,508

Total	$	322,841	$	432,506	$	66,762	$	822,109


	Auction Rate Certificates and Put Rights
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 25, 2009	$	66,762
Gains or losses included in earnings:
Gains from auction rate certificates		7,601
Gain from release of credit risk discount on Put Rights		1,095
Gain from redemption of Put Rights		268
Losses from Put Rights		(7,601	)
Redemptions at par of auction rate certificates		(68,125	)

Balance at September 24, 2010	$	—


	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 26, 2008 (2)			September 25, 2009 (2)			September 24, 2010 (2)
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation
Stock options (1)	$	20,542		$	16,643		$	18,135
Restricted stock units		1,790			5,205			9,560
Employee stock purchase plan		221			529			673
Stock appreciation rights		157			45			447

Total stock-based compensation		22,710			22,422			28,815
Benefit from income taxes		(6,715	)		(7,708	)		(9,805	)

Total stock-based compensation, net of tax	$	15,995		$	14,714		$	19,010


	Shares			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)					(in years)		(in thousands)
Options outstanding at September 25, 2009		6,540		$	25.36
Grants		1,572			52.37
Exercises		(2,167	)		17.69
Forfeitures		(320	)		38.25

Options outstanding at September 24, 2010		5,625			35.05		7.3	$	150,628

Options vested and expected to vest at September 24, 2010		5,286			34.73		7.3		144,198

Options exercisable at September 24, 2010		2,383			22.91		5.7		92,529


	Outstanding Options						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Shares		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price
	(in thousands)		(in years)				(in thousands)
$1.25 - $1.25		19		1.1	$	1.25		19	$	1.25
$1.26 - $1.26		60		1.3		1.26		60		1.26
$2.08 - $6.28		548		3.6		2.08		548		2.08
$6.29 - $19.21		392		4.6		15.29		392		15.29
$19.22 - $28.12		93		5.8		22.26		84		21.77
$28.13 - $38.20		1,995		7.4		31.35		885		30.88
$38.21 - $48.14		526		8.0		42.84		167		43.04
$48.15 - $51.18		560		7.5		48.28		220		48.20
$51.19 and above		1,432		9.5		52.93		8		53.11

		5,625						2,383


	Shares			Weighted-Average Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Non-vested at September 25, 2009		613		$	36.43
Granted		444			52.64
Vested		(189	)		36.81
Forfeitures		(45	)		32.15

Non-vested at September 24, 2010		823			44.91


	Severance			Facilities and contract termination costs			Fixed assets write-off			Other associated costs			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 26, 2008	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Restructuring charges		3,994			232			141			480			4,847
Cash payments		(2,891	)		(144	)		—			(460	)		(3,495	)
Non-cash charges		—			—			(141	)		—			(141	)

Balance at September 25, 2009	$	1,103		$	88		$	—		$	20		$	1,211


	Severance			Facilities and contract termination costs			Fixed assets impairment			Other associated costs			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 25, 2009	$	1,103		$	88		$	—		$	20		$	1,211
Restructuring charges		3,084			—			3,392			550			7,026
Cash payments		(1,383	)		(88	)		—			(182	)		(1,653	)
Non-cash charges		—			—			(3,392	)		(158	)		(3,550	)

Balance at September 24, 2010	$	2,804		$	—		$	—		$	230		$	3,034


	(in thousands)
Balance as of September 26, 2008	$	15,525
Lapse of statute of limitations		(171	)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years		(593	)
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years		632
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year		1,523

Balance as of September 25, 2009	$	16,916
Lapse of statute of limitations		(2,143	)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years		—
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years		520
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year		1,265

Balance as of September 24, 2010	$	16,558


	Operating leases (1)		Payment on litigation settlement (2)		Purchase obligations (3)		Total
	(in thousands)
Fiscal 2011	$	6,882	$	3,000	$	3,438	$	13,320
Fiscal 2012		6,291		—		—		6,291
Fiscal 2013		5,321		—		—		5,321
Fiscal 2014		3,644		—		—		3,644
Fiscal 2015		1,191		—		—		1,191
Thereafter		1,551		—		—		1,551

Total	$	24,880	$	3,000	$	3,438	$	31,318


	Shares Repurchased		Cost (in thousands) (1)		Average Price Paid per Share (2)
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended December 25, 2009		345,400	$	15,661	$	45.33
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended March 26, 2010		1,262,085		67,463		53.45
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended June 25, 2010		1,491,691		94,524		63.37
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010		1,048,943		63,714		60.73

Total		4,148,119	$	241,362


Company Name	Ownership interest as of September 24, 2010
Dolby Properties, LLC		37.5	%
Dolby Properties Brisbane, LLC		49.0	%
Dolby Properties Burbank, LLC		49.0	%
Dolby Properties United Kingdom, LLC		49.0	%
Dolby Properties, LP		10.0	%


	Fiscal Quarter Ended
	December 26, 2008			March 27, 2009		June 26, 2009		September 25, 2009		December 25, 2009		March 26, 2010		June 25, 2010		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
Licensing	$	154,056		$	159,879	$	142,141	$	138,621	$	165,775	$	195,944	$	170,326	$	178,429
Product sales		17,946			36,008		21,790		20,223		47,657		39,839		52,651		40,255
Services		8,256			8,237		7,313		5,033		7,784		7,638		7,292		9,123

Total revenue		180,258			204,124		171,244		163,877		221,216		243,421		230,269		227,807
Cost of revenue		(4,228	)		31,982		19,750		17,264		35,793		29,623		40,056		26,343

Gross margin		184,486			172,142		151,494		146,613		185,423		213,798		190,213		201,464

Income before taxes and controlling interest		116,960			108,219		79,019		67,221		106,379		133,929		98,082		98,622

Net income	$	78,095		$	69,451	$	51,146	$	44,299	$	69,086	$	85,898	$	63,452	$	65,011

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.69		$	0.62	$	0.45	$	0.39	$	0.61	$	0.75	$	0.56	$	0.58
Diluted	$	0.68		$	0.60	$	0.44	$	0.38	$	0.59	$	0.74	$	0.55	$	0.57
Shares outstanding:
Basic		112,608			112,852		113,261		113,684		114,085		113,985		113,254		112,486
Diluted		114,870			115,059		115,528		115,845		116,138		115,995		115,282		114,276